2014
DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2013.843889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Do We Need ‘Myth-Busting’ in the Study of Sino–African Relations?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These scholars put Chinese foreign policy in Africa in context, and point out that its behaviour is not particularly unique. It has given humanitarian aid to local autocrats for the sake of securing natural resources at times, but so have many other countries, including Western liberal democracies (see Hirono and Suzuki, 2014). 3 For more on the implications of China not being a part of DAC, see Woods (2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scholars put Chinese foreign policy in Africa in context, and point out that its behaviour is not particularly unique. It has given humanitarian aid to local autocrats for the sake of securing natural resources at times, but so have many other countries, including Western liberal democracies (see Hirono and Suzuki, 2014). 3 For more on the implications of China not being a part of DAC, see Woods (2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is compounded by the fact that both African and Chinese scholars are very much reliant on Western literature. This argument is well made by Hirono and Suzuki (2014) in their article in the Journal of Contemporary China entitled "Why do we need 'myth-busting' in the study of Sino-African relations?" They conclude that it is necessary "… to encourage Chinese and African scholars to set the research agendas of China-Africa relations" (Hirono and Suszuki, 2014: 459) and to produce their own critical perspectives.…”
Section: The Africa-china Research Groupmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…3 We do not argue that evidentiary challenges are the only reason that certain donors are maligned in the public sphere. As Hirono and Suzuki (2014) suggest, many studies of Chinese and other non-Western aid may be guided by motives other than the pursuit of scientific knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%