Abstract:Purpose of review
The use of evidence-based practices in clinical practice is frequently inadequate. Recent research has uncovered many barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practices in critical care medicine. Using a comprehensive conceptual framework, this review identifies and classifies the barriers to implementation of several major critical care evidence-based practices.
Recent findings
The many barriers that have been recently identified can be classified into domains of the consolidated f… Show more
“…However, this study also showed the low frequency to equip the specific protocol in each ICU, or 50% or less, which could be considered as one of the major barriers to be managed regardless of the presence of COVID-19. As many studies successfully showed a pivotal role for implementation or introduction of ICU care, this simple, but not time-or resource-consuming approach could be a key stimulus and should be routine in the ICU to facilitate efficient implementation of evidence-based approaches to ICU care (12,16,37,38). Tele-medicine, which is getting public interest and recommended in several elements such as elements E (39) and F (37,40), could be also an alternative to promote implementation instead of strict regulations regarding infection control or family visits.…”
Background: Data regarding delivery of evidence-based care to critically ill patients in Intensive Care Units (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic is crucial but lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation rate of the ABCDEF bundle, which is a collection of six evidence-based ICU care initiatives which are strongly recommended to be incorporated into clinical practice, and ICU diaries for patients with and without COVID-19 infections in ICUs, and to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on implementation of each element of the bundle and independent associated factors.Methods: A world-wide 1-day point prevalence study investigated the delivery of the ABCDEF bundle and ICU diary to patients without or with COVID-19 infections on 27 January 2021 via an online questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with adjustment for patient demographics evaluated the impact of COVID-19 and identified factors in ICU administrative structures and policies independently associated with delivery.Results: From 54 countries and 135 ICUs, 1,229 patients were eligible, and 607 (49%) had COVID-19 infections. Implementation rates were: entire bundle (without COVID-19: 0% and with COVID-19: 1%), Element A (regular pain assessment: 64 and 55%), Element B (both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials: 17 and 10%), Element C (regular sedation assessment: 45 and 61%), Element D (regular delirium assessment: 39 and 35%), Element E (exercise: 22 and 25%), Element F (family engagement/empowerment: 16 and 30%), and ICU diary (17 and 21%). The presence of COVID-19 was not associated with failure to implement individual elements. Independently associated factors for each element in common between the two groups included presence of a specific written protocol, application of a target/goal, and tele-ICU management. A lower income status country and a 3:1 nurse-patient ratio were significantly associated with non-implementation of elements A, C, and D, while a lower income status country was also associated with implementation of element F.Conclusions: Regardless of COVID-19 infection status, implementation rates for the ABCDEF bundle, for each element individually and an ICU diary were extremely low for patients without and with COVID-19 infections during the pandemic. Strategies to facilitate implementation of and adherence to the complete ABCDEF bundle should be optimized and addressed based on unit-specific barriers and facilitators.
“…However, this study also showed the low frequency to equip the specific protocol in each ICU, or 50% or less, which could be considered as one of the major barriers to be managed regardless of the presence of COVID-19. As many studies successfully showed a pivotal role for implementation or introduction of ICU care, this simple, but not time-or resource-consuming approach could be a key stimulus and should be routine in the ICU to facilitate efficient implementation of evidence-based approaches to ICU care (12,16,37,38). Tele-medicine, which is getting public interest and recommended in several elements such as elements E (39) and F (37,40), could be also an alternative to promote implementation instead of strict regulations regarding infection control or family visits.…”
Background: Data regarding delivery of evidence-based care to critically ill patients in Intensive Care Units (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic is crucial but lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation rate of the ABCDEF bundle, which is a collection of six evidence-based ICU care initiatives which are strongly recommended to be incorporated into clinical practice, and ICU diaries for patients with and without COVID-19 infections in ICUs, and to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on implementation of each element of the bundle and independent associated factors.Methods: A world-wide 1-day point prevalence study investigated the delivery of the ABCDEF bundle and ICU diary to patients without or with COVID-19 infections on 27 January 2021 via an online questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with adjustment for patient demographics evaluated the impact of COVID-19 and identified factors in ICU administrative structures and policies independently associated with delivery.Results: From 54 countries and 135 ICUs, 1,229 patients were eligible, and 607 (49%) had COVID-19 infections. Implementation rates were: entire bundle (without COVID-19: 0% and with COVID-19: 1%), Element A (regular pain assessment: 64 and 55%), Element B (both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials: 17 and 10%), Element C (regular sedation assessment: 45 and 61%), Element D (regular delirium assessment: 39 and 35%), Element E (exercise: 22 and 25%), Element F (family engagement/empowerment: 16 and 30%), and ICU diary (17 and 21%). The presence of COVID-19 was not associated with failure to implement individual elements. Independently associated factors for each element in common between the two groups included presence of a specific written protocol, application of a target/goal, and tele-ICU management. A lower income status country and a 3:1 nurse-patient ratio were significantly associated with non-implementation of elements A, C, and D, while a lower income status country was also associated with implementation of element F.Conclusions: Regardless of COVID-19 infection status, implementation rates for the ABCDEF bundle, for each element individually and an ICU diary were extremely low for patients without and with COVID-19 infections during the pandemic. Strategies to facilitate implementation of and adherence to the complete ABCDEF bundle should be optimized and addressed based on unit-specific barriers and facilitators.
“…There is still a significant gap in our understanding of how best to translate knowledge to practice in medicine, and we lack an effective framework for implementing clinical practice. Identified barriers to integration of evidence in the ICU include knowledge gaps, limited interdisciplinary collaboration, and complexity of care ( 47 ). Particularly in ARDS, the initial identification of ARDS is an important diagnostic step prior to initiating possible therapies ( 10 ).…”
OBJECTIVE:
Low tidal volume ventilation and prone positioning are recommended therapies yet underused in acute respiratory distress syndrome. We aimed to assess the role of interventions focused on implementation of low tidal volume ventilation and prone positioning in mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
DATA SOURCES:
PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
STUDY SELECTION:
We searched the four databases from January 1, 2001, to January 28, 2021, for studies that met the predefined search criteria. Selected studies focused on interventions to improve implementation of low tidal volume ventilation and prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
DATA EXTRACTION:
Two authors independently performed study selection and data extraction using a standardized form.
DATA SYNTHESIS:
Due to methodological heterogeneity of included studies, meta-analysis was not feasible; thus, we provided a narrative summary and assessment of the literature. Eight nonrandomized studies met our eligibility criteria. Most studies looked at interventions to improve adherence to low tidal volume ventilation. Most interventions focused on education for providers. Studies were primarily conducted in the ICU and involved trainees, intensivists, respiratory therapists, and critical care nurses. Although overall quality of the studies was very low, the primary outcomes of interest suggest that interventions could improve adherence to or implementation of low tidal volume ventilation and prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Measurements and Main Results:
Two authors independently performed study selection and data extraction using a standardized form. Due to methodologic heterogeneity of included studies, meta-analysis was not feasible; thus, we provided a narrative summary and assessment of the literature. Eight nonrandomized studies met our eligibility criteria. Most studies looked at interventions to improve adherence to low tidal volume ventilation. Most interventions focused on education for providers. Studies were primarily conducted in the ICU and involved trainees, intensivists, respiratory therapists, and critical care nurses. Although overall quality of the studies was very low, the primary outcomes of interest suggest that interventions could improve adherence to or implementation of low tidal volume ventilation and prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Conclusions:
There is a dearth of literature addressing interventions to improve implementation of evidence-based practices in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Existing interventions to improve clinician knowledge and facilitate application of low tidal volume ventilation and prone positioning may be effective, but supporting studies have significant limitations.
“…In line with our results, in vivo and ex vivo adult rat studies examining the impact of high V T without PEEP on surfactant and lung function also demonstrated an impaired lung compliance accompanied by increased total surfactant pools in BALF. Further analyses of BALF revealed an elevated SA/LA ratio and poor surfactant surface tension lowering properties (31,44,45). LAs represent the biophysically active form and consist of TM, LBL, ML, and MV surfactant structures.…”
The poorly understood tolerance towards high tidal volume (VT) ventilation observed in critically ill children and age-equivalent animal models may be explained by surfactant homeostasis. The aim of our prospective animal study was to test whether high VT with adequate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is associated with surfactant de novo synthesis and secretion leading to improved lung function and whether extreme mechanical ventilation affects intracellular lamellar body formation and exocytosis. Fourteen days old rats were allocated to five groups: non-ventilated controls, PEEP 5 cmH2O with VT of 8, 16, and 24 mL/kg, respectively, and PEEP 1 cmH2O with VT 24 mL/kg. Following 6 hours of ventilation, lung function, surfactant proteins and phospholipids, and lamellar bodies were assessed by forced oscillation technique, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, mass spectrometry, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy, respectively. High VT (24 mL/kg) with PEEP of 5 cmH2O improved respiratory system mechanics and was not associated with lung injury, elevated surfactant protein expression, or surfactant phospholipid content. Extreme ventilation with VT 24 mL/kg and PEEP 1 cmH2O produced a mild inflammatory response and correlated with higher surfactant phospholipid concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid without affecting lamellar body count and morphology. Elevated phospholipid concentrations in the potentially most injurious strategy (VT 24 mL/kg, PEEP 1 cmH2O) need further evaluation and might reflect accumulation of biophysically inactive small aggregates. In conclusion, our data confirm the resilience of infant rats towards high VT-induced lung injury and challenge the relevance of surfactant synthesis, storage, and secretion as protective factors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.