Why do statistics journals have low impact factors?

Abstract

In this paper, we answer the question why statistics journals get lower impact factors than journals in other disciplines. We analyze diffusion patterns of papers in several journals in various academic fields. To obtain insights into the diffusion of the citation counts of the papers, the data are analysed with the Bass model, leading to values for the time-to-peak that can be used to compare the speeds of diffusion paper citations of the different disciplines. Estimation results show that for statistics journals, it takes significantly more years to reach their peak. To further investigate diffusion, we also compute the percentages of the total number of citations a paper has after 2 or 3 years.Again, it appears that statistics journals have slower citation diffusion than journals in other disciplines. We conclude with some suggestions to reduce this disparity.

The Assessment of Research Quality in UK Universities: Peer Review or Metrics?

“…Even papers published early on in the research assessment cycle may not be cited for several years due to publication lags in the citing papers (van Nierop, 2009). This time-lag problem has led to the use of a proxy based on the 'quality' of the journal in which a paper is published.…”

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor in a Rapidly Changing Digital World

“…This may invalidate comparisons, not only across disciplines, but even within different fields of research in a specific discipline (Anauati et al, 2014). The percentage of total citations occurring in the first two years after publication also varies highly among disciplines, from 1-3% in the mathematical and physical sciences, to 5-8% in the biological sciences (van Nierop, 2009). In short, impact factors should not be used to compare journals across disciplines.…”

Criteria for Evaluating Journals in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Agriculture, Natural Resources, and the Life Sciences

“…Questions centered on its validity, its variation among disciplines (Leydesdorff, 2008;Van Nierop, 2009), and a low correlation with expert opinion surveys (Serenko & Dohan, 2011). It includes self-citations, and a single, highly cited article can strongly influence it (McGarty, 2000).…”