Why Do Patients and Caregivers Seek Answers From the Internet and Online Lung Specialists? A Qualitative Study

Abstract

BackgroundSince its launch in 2003, the Dutch Lung Cancer Information Center’s (DLIC) website has become increasingly popular. The most popular page of the website is the section “Ask the Physician”, where visitors can ask an online lung specialist questions anonymously and receive an answer quickly. Most questions were not only asked by lung cancer patients but also by their informal caregivers. Most questions concerned specific information about lung cancer.ObjectiveOur goal was to explore the reasons why lung cancer patients and caregivers search the Internet for information and ask online lung specialists questions on the DLIC’s interactive page, “Ask the Physician”, rather than consulting with their own specialist.MethodsThis research consisted of a qualitative study with semistructured telephone interviews about medical information-seeking behavior (eg, information needs, reasons for querying online specialists). The sample comprised 5 lung cancer patients and 20 caregivers who posed a question on the interactive page of the DLIC website.ResultsRespondents used the Internet and the DLIC website to look for lung cancer–related information (general/specific to their personal situation) and to cope with cancer. They tried to achieve a better understanding of the information given by their own specialist and wanted to be prepared for the treatment trajectory and disease course. This mode of information supply helped them cope and gave them emotional support. The interactive webpage was also used as a second opinion. The absence of face-to-face contact made respondents feel freer to ask for any kind of information. By being able to pose a question instantly and receiving a relatively quick reply from the online specialist to urgent questions, respondents felt an easing of their anxiety as they did not have to wait until the next consultation with their own specialist.ConclusionsThe DLIC website with its interactive page is a valuable complementary mode of information supply and supportive care for lung cancer patients and caregivers.

The influence of educational level and oral hygiene behaviours on DMFT index and CPITN index in an adult Italian population: an epidemiological study

“…In the present study, the sources of information for oral health issues were predominantly Internet, magazines and newspapers followed, in decreasing order, by dental professionals, radio and television, family members and/or friends. Nowadays Internet is massively used to seek information concerning oral health issues such as finding therapist or sharing treatment‐related experiences and attitudes . However, the information provided might be inaccurate as (i) it might be not always in agreement with the recommendations of professional dental associations or (ii) it might be insufficient or scientifically incorrect .…”

Strategies for healthcare professionals to facilitate patient illness understanding

“…The healthcare professionals in this study noted that it is common that patients themselves seek information on their illness on the Internet or from other sources, and therefore come well informed to the meeting with the healthcare professional. This relates to the observation that patients often try to achieve a better understanding of the information provided by their healthcare professionals (Schook et al., ). When a patient seeks care for self‐perceived physical or psychological symptoms, they may already have set beliefs concerning the illness.…”

Attitudes towards second opinion services in cancer care: a nationwide survey of oncologists in Korea

“…In the US, patients can receive online access to second opinion services from renowned medical institutions by submitting their medical record via the Internet at the average cost of US$500-1500, depending on the number of radiology or pathology interpretations required (4,10,29,33). In the Netherlands, the Dutch Lung Cancer Information Center provides online specialists and second opinion consultations to patients or informal caregivers (34). In Korea, where such remote services are not allowed, there was disagreement among physicians regarding remote consultations and first opinion physicians' involvement in them.…”