Why Do Experienced Challengers Do Better than Amateurs?

Abstract

Politically experienced challengers are more successful in seeking political office than amateurs. The relationship is found so regularly that political experience has become the standard ex ante indicator of challenger quality in studies of American elections. Despite this, little work has investigated why experienced challengers are so successful. Many scholars attribute the relationship to inherent differences between experienced challengers and amateurs: experienced challengers have stronger electoral skills and greater access to material resources. I argue that these differences play a role, but an indirect one. Rather, experienced challengers are lead by both their resource advantage and the high amount of risk they are exposed to in seeking office to run in races in which their party has a good chance of winning. Thus, the direct cause of the experienced challengers' success is self-selection into winnable races. Empirical analysis supports the self-selection model over a model in which resources directly lead to success.

Public Attention and Head-to-Head Campaign Fundraising: An Examination of U.S. Senate Elections

“…Likewise, open seat races tend to attract candidates are relatively unknown to potential contributors. Because open seat races often provide the best opportunity for a party to pick up seats (Mayhew 1974), having an advantage in fundraising is critical to winning (Lazarus 2008 …”

Necessary Asymmetry or Undemocratic Imbalance? Professionalisation in the Recruitment and Career of Belgian Local Councillors

“…Laymen are thereby usually embedded in organisations of their local community whilst political parties are the outstanding apprenticeship for professionalised councillors (Eliassen and Pedersen 1978). Consequently, parties are claimed to be the perfect steppingstone towards a political career (Moyser and Parry 1986, Meadowcroft 2001, Lazarus 2008.…”

Der Gender Gap in Schweizer Stadtparlamenten

“…So zeigte sich in verschiedenen Studien, dass die politische Partei eine zentrale politische Ausbildungsstätte darstellt und die Mitgliedschaft in einer Partei ein perfektes Sprungbrett für ein politisches Mandat und die weitere politische Laufbahn bedeutet (vgl. Lazarus 2008; Moyser/Parry 1986; Prewitt 1970). In den Schweizer Stadtparlamenten sind insgesamt 87.6% aller Mitglieder als Kandidaten einer nationalen Partei ins Amt gewählt worden.…”