Why do crop models diverge substantially in climate impact projections? A comprehensive analysis based on eight barley crop models

Abstract

Robust projections of climate impact on crop growth and productivity by crop models are key to designing effective adaptations to cope with future climate risk. However, current crop models diverge strongly in their climate impact projections. Previous studies tried to compare or improve crop models regarding the impact of one single climate variable. However, this approach is insufficient, considering that crop growth and yield are affected by the interactive impacts of multiple climate change factors and multiple interrelated biophysical processes. Here, a new comprehensive analysis was conducted to look holistically at the reasons why crop models diverge substantially in climate impact projections and to investigate which biophysical processes and knowledge gaps are key factors affecting this uncertainty and should be given the highest priorities for improvement. First, eight barley models and eight climate projections for the 2050s were applied to investigate the uncertainty from crop model structure in climate impact projections for barley growth and yield at two sites: Jokioinen, Finland (Boreal) and Lleida, Spain (Mediterranean). Sensitivity analyses were then conducted on the responses of major crop processes to major climatic variables including temperature, precipitation, irradiation, and CO 2 , as well as their interactions, for each of the eight crop models. The results showed that the temperature and CO 2 relationships in the models were the major sources of the large discrepancies among the models in climate impact projections. In particular, the impacts of increases in temperature and CO 2 on leaf area development were identified as the major causes for the large uncertainty in simulating changes in evapotranspiration, above-ground biomass, and grain yield. Our findings highlight that advancements in understanding the basic processes and thresholds by which climate warming and CO 2 increases will affect leaf area development, crop evapotranspiration, photosynthesis, and grain formation in contrasting environments are needed for modeling their impacts.

Plant growth: the What, the How, and the Why

“…The capacity of crop models to account for source–sink manipulation is therefore questionable (Asseng et al ., 2017). A recent study evaluated why several crop models diverge in their prediction of barley production in response to climate change, particularly at high temperatures and elevated CO 2 (Tao et al ., 2020). The difference originated from models limiting growth directly vs others that used indirect limitation (e.g.…”

Modelling climate change impacts on maize yields under low nitrogen input conditions in sub‐Saharan Africa

“…Crop model intercomparisons have proven useful to compare consistency among models and quantify uncertainty in model predictions (Asseng et al., 2013; Bassu et al., 2014; Fleisher et al., 2017; Li et al., 2015; Ruane et al., 2017). They have reinforced the benefit of multimodel approaches, as they help identify sources of uncertainty (associated with model parameters, model structure and model users; Tao et al., 2018, 2020). The ensemble mean or median usually resulted as best predictors for multiple crops and for different soil and plant variables (Martre et al., 2015; Wallach et al., 2018).…”

The impact of climate change in wheat and barley yields in the Iberian Peninsula

“…Conversely, the northward shift of suitable area should make the northern cluster more apt for wheat production, without changing sowing dates 78 . Moreover, it is relevant to stress that projections of wheat and barley yields to the mid-of-century period entail uncertainties due to multiple interrelated biophysical processes 58 . The use of multi-model ensembles should be seen as a tool to reduce these uncertainties.…”