2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0929-1393(02)00131-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why do cereal–legume intercrops support large earthworm populations?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase in earthworms with direct drilling under a legume cover crop was found by Schmidt et al (2003). In the same way, Riley et al (2008) observed an increase in earthworm population and activity in an organic arable system after 1 year of a grass-clover ley.…”
Section: Biomass and Abundance Of Earthwormsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…An increase in earthworms with direct drilling under a legume cover crop was found by Schmidt et al (2003). In the same way, Riley et al (2008) observed an increase in earthworm population and activity in an organic arable system after 1 year of a grass-clover ley.…”
Section: Biomass and Abundance Of Earthwormsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Schmidt et al (2003) found that the combination of direct drilling and clover understory in cereal systems, increased the earthworm population greatly (50%). This was primarily because of a favourable input of organic matter in terms of quantity, quality and continuity of food supply throughout the year.…”
Section: Earthworm Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimentally induced absence of earthworms in a grass sward was found to increase soil bulk density and shear strength and to greatly reduce soil organic matter, soil moisture and infiltration rate (Clements et al, 1991). Systems with grass and clover in the rotation often host higher biomass and numbers of earthworms compared with all-arable systems (Edwards and Lofty, 1977;Schmidt et al, 2003). Organic cropping systems have shown higher earthworm biomass and density than conventional systems (Mäder et al, 2002), but this is not always so (Scullion et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ceci implique par conséquent une dépendance des communautés lombriciennes vis-à-vis de la disponibilité des ressources alimentaires et révèle la prise en compte du gradient de végétation. A cet effet, il est bien connu que la disponibilité et la nature des ressources organiques, elles-mêmes étroitement liée aux activités anthropiques, influencent à la fois l'abondance et la diversité des communautés de vers de terre (Schmidt et al, 2003). C'est ce qui expliquerait le cas échéant la faible diversité observée dans les écosystèmes anthropisés.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified