2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why did so few refugees return to the Fukushima fallout-impacted region after remediation? An interdisciplinary case study from Iitate village, Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key question is, was the time, expense, and waste generated to restore 16% of the contaminated area worth the investment? As of 2019, 30% of the population returned to the region ( 48 ), which would not have been possible without the remediation effort. In any case, we hope that our results raise questions and lead to robust discussions among scientists, policy makers, and citizens about how to deal with potential nuclear fallout disasters in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key question is, was the time, expense, and waste generated to restore 16% of the contaminated area worth the investment? As of 2019, 30% of the population returned to the region ( 48 ), which would not have been possible without the remediation effort. In any case, we hope that our results raise questions and lead to robust discussions among scientists, policy makers, and citizens about how to deal with potential nuclear fallout disasters in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%