2019
DOI: 10.1111/geer.12153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Did Income Inequality in Germany Not Increase Further After 2005?

Abstract: While income inequality in Germany considerably increased in the years before 2005, this trend stopped after 2005. We address the question of what factors were responsible for the break in the inequality trend after 2005. Our analysis suggests that income inequality in Germany did not continue to rise after 2005 for the following reasons. First, we observe that the general rise in wage inequality that explained a lot of the inequality increase before 2005, became less steep (but did not stop) after 2005. Secon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Past studies report a rise in net income inequality in Germany in the 1990s until 2005/2006 and a subsequent stagnation characterized by small ups and downs (e.g. Biewen and Juhasz, 2012;Biewen et al, 2017;Jessen, 2019;Peichl et al, 2012). These studies identify changes in employment driven by part-time and marginal part-time work, and changes in the tax system as the major driver of this development, as well as the rising dispersion of labor market incomes due to skill-biased technological change (see Dustmann et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Past studies report a rise in net income inequality in Germany in the 1990s until 2005/2006 and a subsequent stagnation characterized by small ups and downs (e.g. Biewen and Juhasz, 2012;Biewen et al, 2017;Jessen, 2019;Peichl et al, 2012). These studies identify changes in employment driven by part-time and marginal part-time work, and changes in the tax system as the major driver of this development, as well as the rising dispersion of labor market incomes due to skill-biased technological change (see Dustmann et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible reason for this, is that several elements that explained the income inequality increase before 2005 became less strong over time. For instance, the rise in wage inequality became less steep, employment opportunities increased, and the middle and upper part of the distribution benefited from the employment boom after 2006 (Biewen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Income distribution widened considerably during the first half of the 2000s, driven by developments in the labour market and changes in the tax system (Biewen andJuhasz 2012, Bach, Corneo andSteiner 2013). Since 2005 inequality has remained stable, even during the Great Recession, largely as a result of the expansion of employment opportunities Schupp 2012, Biewen, Ungerer andLöffler 2017). In France, income inequality begun to rise at the end of the 1990s: Frémeaux and Piketty (2014) suggest that it was partly due to the lack of progressivity of the overall tax system, a feature that was reinforced during the 2000s.…”
Section: Inequality In National Income Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die vorliegende Studie ergänzt eine Reihe von Studien über die Steuer-und Abgabenlast in Deutschland (Bach et al, 2016;RWI, 2011RWI, , 2015RWI, , 2017RWI und FiFo Köln, 2007 Abgaben-und Transfersystems (z. B. Biewen und Juhasz, 2012;Bach et al, 2009;Biewen et al, 2019;Jessen, 2019) oder berechnet die Progressivität des Umverteilungssystems mithilfe von Kennzahlen (z. B. Bach et al, 2016;Schaefer und Peichl, 2008).…”
unclassified