2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2255944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Crowdfunding Projects Can Succeed: The Role of Proponents’ Individual and Territorial Social Capital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
64
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, CF project sizes vary, ranging from several thousand to several million USD, and the size reflects the characteristics of a project, and thus, results in distinct performance and behavior patterns. Similar claims have been indirectly supported in recent studies by Giudici et al [8], Mollick [9], and Zheng et al [10], who all applied the social capital perspective in explaining the success of CF projects, indicating that initiators of these two types of CF project perform and behave differently because of their specific purposes in gaining attention and sponsorship from crowd funders; however, none of them offered a prediction model with strong explanatory power. However, as argued by Lehner [7], current CF study analyzing the supply side remains immature and incomplete.…”
Section: Research Background and Questionssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Moreover, CF project sizes vary, ranging from several thousand to several million USD, and the size reflects the characteristics of a project, and thus, results in distinct performance and behavior patterns. Similar claims have been indirectly supported in recent studies by Giudici et al [8], Mollick [9], and Zheng et al [10], who all applied the social capital perspective in explaining the success of CF projects, indicating that initiators of these two types of CF project perform and behave differently because of their specific purposes in gaining attention and sponsorship from crowd funders; however, none of them offered a prediction model with strong explanatory power. However, as argued by Lehner [7], current CF study analyzing the supply side remains immature and incomplete.…”
Section: Research Background and Questionssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Mollick [17], Giudici [8] and Moisseyev [16] found that signals of individual social capital, such as social network size, and the number of Facebook "likes" for a project page, are correlated with crowdfunding success. Similarly, Wojciechowski described the importance of project creator credibility [21], which can be signaled by public symbols of approval.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several analyses show the signifi cant role of social media in project success (e.g. Mollick 2014;Ordanini et al 2011;and Giudici et al 2013). Second, instead of using the number of rewards, the quality of rewards could be included.…”
Section: Results Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%