1997
DOI: 10.1108/03068299710178991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why China has done better than Russia since 1989

Abstract: Looks briefly at where China has done better than the Russian Federation in the process of transition from a centrally planned to a market economy. Examines various possible reasons for the different degree of success, drawn from such disciplines as economics, political science, international relations and history, as well the administration and processes adopted, and the cultures involved. Finally, considers a cross‐discipline explanation. Concludes that it is neither possible nor desirable to seek a single e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Entrepreneurs emerged from the shadows after the introduction of the Law on Co-operation in the USSR in 1989 under "perestroika" (transition). Reforms in post-Soviet countries involved both "political and economic change, which caused major disruptions and suffering" (Bucknall, 1997(Bucknall, , pp. 1028 at the beginning of reforms.…”
Section: Temporal and Historical Aspects Of The Entrepreneurship Context In Russia And Ukrainementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entrepreneurs emerged from the shadows after the introduction of the Law on Co-operation in the USSR in 1989 under "perestroika" (transition). Reforms in post-Soviet countries involved both "political and economic change, which caused major disruptions and suffering" (Bucknall, 1997(Bucknall, , pp. 1028 at the beginning of reforms.…”
Section: Temporal and Historical Aspects Of The Entrepreneurship Context In Russia And Ukrainementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from S&T, the industrial sector in Russia was “seriously ill” before the reform began (Bucknall, 1997) and numerous authors have described elsewhere the main reasons for this state of affairs (Watkins, 2003; OECD, 2004; Gokhberg, 2004; Gokhberg and Shuvalova, 2004; Lachinov, 2005; S&T Overview, 2006; Trifilova et al , 2007). In the words of Watkins (2003, p. 1), the starting point for the development of Russian innovation systems in the 1990s was “a combination of a depressed economic base characterised by a […] depreciating, obsolete industrial capital, and a sophisticated science and technology infrastructure […] a world leader in many fields”.…”
Section: The Russian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the shock therapy experience in Russia suggested indeed that immediate privatisation of all state enterprises was not the best modus operandi to proceed (cf. Bucknall, 1997).…”
Section: Gradualism In the Reforms Of The Chinese Financial Systemmentioning
confidence: 95%