2012
DOI: 10.1002/sres.2136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Can't We All Just Accommodate: A Soft Systems Methodology Application on Disagreeing Stakeholders

Abstract: The idea of accommodating worldviews in problem structuring is a common approach across many methodologies. A key assumption of this research is the idea that actors must reach a point where a debate about change, through an accommodation of worldviews, can occur. This paper looks at a field study where actors actively used their declared worldviews against each other to argue for change. Even though this process led to a stalling of the method, an argument is made that there is still much to be learned from a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is assumed that a facilitator/analyst will model the tensions in a way that reflects the group's intentions. However, as discussed elsewhere (see Houghton ), modelling disagreement can result in problems that may see certain actors ‘pushing’ their own perspective and railroading others. We do not have an immediate answer to this issue as such but for future research we would argue that addressing this is of paramount concern.…”
Section: Concept Shifting: a Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that a facilitator/analyst will model the tensions in a way that reflects the group's intentions. However, as discussed elsewhere (see Houghton ), modelling disagreement can result in problems that may see certain actors ‘pushing’ their own perspective and railroading others. We do not have an immediate answer to this issue as such but for future research we would argue that addressing this is of paramount concern.…”
Section: Concept Shifting: a Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to say, the team creating the map may not know if their new map is likely to be more (or less) useful than their previous map for supporting successful decisions. Thus, presumably collaborative approaches may lead to disagreement and conflict (Houghton, ).…”
Section: A More Systemic Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early stages of applying system thinking, the root definitions are meant to provide how stakeholders look at π as a system. Root definition is also used to come up with a unified view of what stakeholders want to achieve (Houghton, 2013). In the case of this study, the use of root of definition is more conducted in producing views of relevant systems as opposed to the view leading the rich picture.…”
Section: Three Root Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%