2016
DOI: 10.1111/aman.12603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Why Can't People Feed Themselves?”: Archaeology as Alternative Archive of Food Security in Banda, Ghana

Abstract: Today, food insecurity is associated with both severe climatic shifts and pervasive poverty. What is less well understood is how the problem of hunger came to take its present-day form, especially in the African continent, where the highest prevalence of undernourishment is found. In this article, I propose that archaeology can be used as an alternative archive of food security. Material remains provide a from-the-hearth-up view of changing foodways and political economy and can be used to trace the shape of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the ethnographic vignettes presented here demonstrate, anti‐colonial utterances are not simply discursive tactics used by speakers; they are reflective of both contemporary life and imagined futures in postcolonial Ghana (Fanon ; Nkrumah ; Pierre ). Thus, it should not come as a surprise that Ghanaians critique and resist international discourses of Africa as a singular, starving place, insisting that assumptions of food deficiency may not be the best place to start conversations (Logan ; Reese ). It is this reality that Ghanaian scientists, officials, and activists call attention to when they write “obviously Ghana is not a hungry country,” tell the press “there are no hungry people in this land,” and declare “we are not starving.” Ghanaian interlocutors demand to be recognized and included by development planners.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the ethnographic vignettes presented here demonstrate, anti‐colonial utterances are not simply discursive tactics used by speakers; they are reflective of both contemporary life and imagined futures in postcolonial Ghana (Fanon ; Nkrumah ; Pierre ). Thus, it should not come as a surprise that Ghanaians critique and resist international discourses of Africa as a singular, starving place, insisting that assumptions of food deficiency may not be the best place to start conversations (Logan ; Reese ). It is this reality that Ghanaian scientists, officials, and activists call attention to when they write “obviously Ghana is not a hungry country,” tell the press “there are no hungry people in this land,” and declare “we are not starving.” Ghanaian interlocutors demand to be recognized and included by development planners.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UNDP used seven dimensions–economic, food, health, environmental, personal, community, and political security–many of which can be assessed with archaeological data [48]. Some archaeological applications utilize all seven [49] while others have taken one or a few and considered their multiple components, such as Logan’s work which assessed the food security in terms of availability, access, use, and preference [50,51]. The research reported here considers all seven dimensions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be clear, archaeology does yield insights that are applicable-of use-in the present. Amanda Logan (2016) argues for the importance of archaeology as an "alternative archive of food security" that illuminates how people of Banda, Ghana, avoided famine in the face of a centuries-long drought by relying on indigenous grains that are uncommon today. Her insights can apply to policy and practice today as people confront changing climate (Logan et al 2019), and work like hers has inspired a new "Usable Pasts Forum" as a regular feature of the African Archaeological Review (Ogundiran 2019).…”
Section: To Whom Are We Accountable?mentioning
confidence: 99%