2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rai.2016.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Brazil does not innovate: a comparison among nations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Brazil is the only country in Latin America to invest more than 1% of its GDP in R&D, it places lower in the Global Innovation Index than comparably smaller economies like Chile, Costa Rica, and Mexico [Barroeta et al, 2017;Negri, 2018]. When analyzing other innovation indexes provided by the OECD and the World Bank 1 it becomes clear that Brazil is also failing to catch up to other developed countries in terms of innovation output [Esteves, Feldmann, 2016;Faleiro et al, 2016]. The boom in Brazil's economic growth during the early 2000s (ca.…”
Section: An Overview Of Brazil's Innovation Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although Brazil is the only country in Latin America to invest more than 1% of its GDP in R&D, it places lower in the Global Innovation Index than comparably smaller economies like Chile, Costa Rica, and Mexico [Barroeta et al, 2017;Negri, 2018]. When analyzing other innovation indexes provided by the OECD and the World Bank 1 it becomes clear that Brazil is also failing to catch up to other developed countries in terms of innovation output [Esteves, Feldmann, 2016;Faleiro et al, 2016]. The boom in Brazil's economic growth during the early 2000s (ca.…”
Section: An Overview Of Brazil's Innovation Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to innovation, the case of Brazil is an interesting one: it has many essential assets to be a leading innovator but struggles to turn its advantages into world-class initiatives [Ingold et al, 2015]. The question as to why Brazil has not been able to catch up remains a puzzle with much writing on the topic and many different answers, ranging from lack of collaboration in businesses, huge bureaucratic bodies, too little investment in the education of the public -the list goes on (see e.g., [Baer, 2012;Cavalcante, Uderman, 2012;Esteves, Feldmann, 2016;Maragna, 2016;Mazzucato, Caetano, 2016;Negri, 2018;Pinto, 2018]). Within an EU-Brazil partnership on smart specialization, the potential for smart specialization in Brazil has already been identified and pilot projects are being implemented in some regions [Maragna, 2016;Pinto, 2018].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a dramatic change, and the country's current overall context, depict quite well what Hadjikhani and Johanson (1996) define an emerging economy as being a 'turbulent market'. With regard to innovation, indexes provided by World Bank (2017) show that Brazil is in a worse position in comparison to OECD countries in terms of number of patents, scientific publication and the number of students graduating in technology and engineering (Esteves and Feldmann 2016). While this reflects the country's dependence on imported technologies, it can be a source of business opportunities for service MNEs from the ICT industry, not least if such technologies can be tailored for social progress.…”
Section: Case Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the country accounts for only 0.22% of Latin American STI research outputs and has negligible rates of patent awards [4, 10]. Despite a decade of relative political stability and government education expenditures exceeding 8% of GDP—highest in the region and far above any developed country, with the United States, United Kingdom, and France investing less than 6% of GDP [11-13] — Bolivia consistently places last in the region according to World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and Global Innovation Index measures [14, 15]. The country does not implement standardized education metrics such as the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), further obfuscating causal analyses and international oversight [16] and raising a need for alternative methods of analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%