2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12136-014-0244-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Being Necessary Really Is Not the Same As Being Not Possibly Not

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Some, for instance, worry that n-entities are metaphysically impossible. Goswick (2015) dispels this worry. 8 Quine famously rejected the "metaphysical jungle of Aristotelian essentialism" (1953,174) and the de re modality he took to lead to it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 Some, for instance, worry that n-entities are metaphysically impossible. Goswick (2015) dispels this worry. 8 Quine famously rejected the "metaphysical jungle of Aristotelian essentialism" (1953,174) and the de re modality he took to lead to it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It doesn't follow that o is necessarily colored, it only follows that, if o ceases being colored, o must also cease being red. 11 See Goswick (2015), Goswick (2018a), andGoswick (2018b). 12 One might reject n-entities, but accept other "minimally modal" objects such as Heller's 4D hunks of matter (Heller 1990) or Jubien's stuff (Jubien 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%