Why are relatives of care home residents reluctant to “rock the boat”? Is there a culture of acceptance?

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to explore whether relatives of care home residents are best placed to act as "champions" or advocates for their family members, as is often the expectation. Design/methodology/approach -Focus groups and interviews were conducted with 25 relatives of residents in four care homes for older people in the South East of England. Two rounds of focus groups were held in each participating care home: the first was to discuss any issues arising from the care received, or concerns about the home itself; the second was to enable a deeper exploration of the key themes that arose from the first round and explore why relatives, in this case, failed to complain. Findings -Thematic analysis revealed a complex range of emotions experienced by relatives that contributed to a conflict between what they believed to be the correct response and how they behaved in reality, which led to a culture of acceptance. Analysis revealed some relatives were reluctant to "interfere" for fear of possible negative repercussions, thus they downplayed issues in an attempt not to "rock the boat". Originality/value -This paper discusses the flaws in the policy emphasis on personalisation and the reliance on family members as advocates, and concludes with suggestions on how care homes may foster an environment where relatives, and indeed residents, feel comfortable to raise issues and concerns.

Social Participation in Long-term Residential Care: Case Studies from Canada, Norway, and Germany

“…Understaffing is a chronic concern in long-term care (Armstrong, 2019;Coughlan & Ward, 2007;Diamond, 1992;Foner, 1994;Gass, 2004;Kayser-Jones, 1990;Ronch, 2004;Thomas, O'Connell, & Gaskin, 2013;Welch et al, 2017), which significantly impacts residents' care and quality of life. Staff are so busy attending to mandated tasks, including getting residents out of bed and assisting with eating, bathing, bedmaking, toileting, and documenting, that they have little or no time to spend in a meaningful way with residents.…”

“…The authors also stress that keeping residents "occupied" is "often seen as separate from the main role of caring within homes" (Smith et al, 2018(Smith et al, , p. 2231, reinforcing earlier arguments by Ronch that "Humanization can occur only when the individual needs and characteristics of the people in the care equation … and the quality of the care-givercare-recipient relationships define the quality of care" (Ronch, 2004, p. 67). Including the knowledge and ongoing engagement of family members in this care equation is also essential (Lopez, Mazor, Mitchell, & Givens, 2013;Welch, Palmer, Towers, & Smith, 2017).…”

Older care home residents’ and their relatives’ knowledge, understanding and views of shift handovers: an exploratory, focused-ethnographic qualitative study using interviews and observations

“…Alongside their confidence in the care the home provided, relatives’ general lack of knowledge of and interest in handovers may reflect the effectiveness and appropriateness of care homes’ communication with relatives. While these perspectives may reflect a tendency to accept whatever care is provided due to low expectations or fear,27 28 these relatives’ confidence in care challenges a discourse in the UK that most care is failing and of poor quality 29…”

Being occupied: supporting ‘meaningful activity’ in care homes for older people in England

“…Reducing support in these domains would be unethical and breach their duty of care. Furthermore, relatives, who are often seen as the voice of care home residents, tend to focus on making sure their relatives’ basic needs, such as being clean and fed, are met properly, rather than demanding support for higher-order needs, such as occupation (Lopez et al 2013; Welch et al 2017).…”