2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-232x.2011.00653.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Are Quit Rates Lower Among Defense Contractors?

Abstract: This paper presents empirical evidence of lower quit rates at small manufacturers with defense contracts and examines whether this is associated with differences in their human resource policies and organizational practices and strategies. We take advantage of an original data set to compare labor quits, workforce skills, and occupational structure between defense-contracting and noncontracting small manufacturers in eastern Pennsylvania. We find that the remarkably large defense contractor advantage in quit r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While indirect tests of Hirschman's theory, based on associations between measures of voice and firm outcomes, abound in the economics literature (see, e.g., Batt et al (2002); Beard et al (2009); Cottini et al (2011); Freeman (1980); Gans et al (2017); Watkins and Hyclak (2011)), to our knowledge there has been no rigorous direct test of the impacts of increased voice on worker turnover. 1 In this paper, we seek to provide this evidence via a randomized controlled trial in which we enabled greater voice for workers just after what proved to be a disappointing scheduled wage hike.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While indirect tests of Hirschman's theory, based on associations between measures of voice and firm outcomes, abound in the economics literature (see, e.g., Batt et al (2002); Beard et al (2009); Cottini et al (2011); Freeman (1980); Gans et al (2017); Watkins and Hyclak (2011)), to our knowledge there has been no rigorous direct test of the impacts of increased voice on worker turnover. 1 In this paper, we seek to provide this evidence via a randomized controlled trial in which we enabled greater voice for workers just after what proved to be a disappointing scheduled wage hike.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While indirect tests of Hirschman's theory, based on associations between measures of voice and firm outcomes, abound in the economics literature (see, e.g., Batt et al (2002); Beard et al (2009); Cottini et al (2011); Freeman (1980); Gans et al (2017); Watkins and Hyclak (2011)), to our knowledge there has been no rigorous direct test of the impacts of increased voice on worker turnover. 1 In this paper, we seek to provide this evidence via a randomized controlled trial in which we enabled greater voice for workers just after what proved to be a disappointing scheduled wage hike.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While indirect tests of Hirschman's theory, based on associations between measures of voice and firm outcomes, abound in the economics literature (see, e.g., Batt et al (2002); Beard et al (2009); Cottini et al (2011); Freeman (1980); Gans et al (2017); Watkins and Hyclak (2011)), to our knowledge there has been no rigorous direct test of the impacts of increased voice on worker turnover. 1 In this paper, we seek to provide this evidence via a randomized controlled trial in which we enabled greater voice for workers just after what proved to be a disappointing scheduled wage hike.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%