2019
DOI: 10.1080/08946566.2019.1625842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why are older adults victims of fraud? Current knowledge and prospects regarding older adults’ vulnerability to fraud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Retired, older adults are likely to be more susceptible to specific online threats. In a small scale qualitative study of three older adults, Olivier et al (2015) suggested that they may be at particular risk of mass marketing fraud due to their pscho-social backgrounds and pre-disposing factors such as pschological vulnerability, something which was supported in a recent review of mass marketing fraud by Shao et al (2019). Other research has identified an increased vulnerability to: telemarketing fraud (Alves and Wilson, 2008), phishing (Cho et al, 2016;Sarno et al, 2017), pension Scams (Martin and Rice, 2013;Nicholson et al, 2019), and other such targeted attacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Retired, older adults are likely to be more susceptible to specific online threats. In a small scale qualitative study of three older adults, Olivier et al (2015) suggested that they may be at particular risk of mass marketing fraud due to their pscho-social backgrounds and pre-disposing factors such as pschological vulnerability, something which was supported in a recent review of mass marketing fraud by Shao et al (2019). Other research has identified an increased vulnerability to: telemarketing fraud (Alves and Wilson, 2008), phishing (Cho et al, 2016;Sarno et al, 2017), pension Scams (Martin and Rice, 2013;Nicholson et al, 2019), and other such targeted attacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…One possible explanation is that the sample was recruited through MTurk, so all participants were likely fairly experienced users of technology and the internet, and so may have encountered previous fraudulent financial offers in the past. There is some evidence to suggest that accumulated experience over the course of the lifetime (wise reasoning) can counteract some of the effects of cognitive decline, which may reduce susceptibility to fraud in some cases (Grossmann et al 2013;Shao et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have shown that older individuals are more likely to be targeted and lose money from financial fraud compared to their younger counterparts (Applied Research & Consulting LLC 2013;Dong 2015;James et al 2014;Shao et al 2019;Wood and Lichtenberg 2017). Being a victim of financial fraud can have devastating consequences for those involved, including not just financial losses but also negative physical and psychological health effects including depression, anxiety, shame, and sleep disturbances (Shao et al 2019). The annual financial loss by older adults in the United States due to financial fraud has been estimated at over $2.9 billion dollars, and may be increasing with time (Roberto and Teaster 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, a prevalence rate of 5.6% fraud victimization per year was reported. Shao et al (2019) focused their review on what renders older adults vulnerable to fraud. While there is considerable debate about whether older adults are more susceptible to fraud than other age groups, Shao et al focused on six types of phenomena that were related to fraud in some studies or conceptualizations: cognitive functioning and cognitive decline ( James et al, 2014 ); emotional regulation and the positivity effect—the tendency of older adults to have reduced arousal response to negative circumstances surrounding a financial decision and to have positive expectations around decision making ( Spreng et al, 2016 ); the interplay between personal competencies and the environment ( Pinkser et al, 2009 ); social isolation ( Alves & Wilson, 2008 ); risk taking ( Samanez-Larkin et al, 2007 ); and psychological vulnerability ( Lichtenberg et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Fe As One Outcome Of Financial Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%