2023
DOI: 10.1002/nafm.10903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why are larger fish farther upstream? Testing multiple hypotheses using Silver Chub in two Midwestern United States riverscapes

Joshuah S. Perkin,
Patrick M. Kočovský,
Zachary D. Steffensmeier
et al.

Abstract: ObjectiveThree competing hypotheses might explain the widely documented intrapopulation larger‐fish‐upstream phenomenon. The age‐phased recruitment hypothesis posits that fish spawn downstream and move upstream as they age and grow, the static population with growth and mortality gradients hypothesis posits that fish spawn throughout a riverscape and growth is greater upstream while recruitment is greater downstream, and the colonization cycle hypothesis posits that fish spawn upstream, larvae drift downstream… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Larson et al (2016) and Camacho et al (2019) reported that genetically confirmed Silver Chub eggs were collected in surface ichthyoplankton nets in the upper Mississippi River basin, indicating eggs might be semibuoyant, which would mean Silver Chub are pelagophils. Furthermore, Perkin et al (2023, this special section) reported greater Silver Chub recruitment in longer pools of the Ohio River, which is consistent with the species being a pelagophil (i.e., longer drift potential leading to greater hatching success). In Lake Erie, the only two confirmed Silver Chub larvae were collected in western Lake Erie in ichthyoplankton nets deployed near the surface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Larson et al (2016) and Camacho et al (2019) reported that genetically confirmed Silver Chub eggs were collected in surface ichthyoplankton nets in the upper Mississippi River basin, indicating eggs might be semibuoyant, which would mean Silver Chub are pelagophils. Furthermore, Perkin et al (2023, this special section) reported greater Silver Chub recruitment in longer pools of the Ohio River, which is consistent with the species being a pelagophil (i.e., longer drift potential leading to greater hatching success). In Lake Erie, the only two confirmed Silver Chub larvae were collected in western Lake Erie in ichthyoplankton nets deployed near the surface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In addition, study of the effects of barriers on population viability could be beneficial. Silver Chub is thought to broadcast spawn in open waters (Werner 2004;McKenna et al 2023), and migration is likely an important part of its life cycle (for more details, see Perkin et al 2023, this special section).…”
Section: Genetic Diversity Of Silver Chub Could Be Affected By Habita...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steffensmeier et al (2023, this special section) develop a method for incorporating movement ecology into models describing the distribution of Prairie Chub in the Red River of the South. Perkin et al (2023b, this special section) study longitudinal variation in size distributions of Silver Chub in the Arkansas and Ohio River basins and provide implications for management of longitudinal connectivity. Wedgeworth et al (2023, this special section) and Perkin et al (2023a, this special section) study flow–recruitment relationships for the Prairie Chub and the Shoal Chub, respectively, and separately report positive correlations between streamflow variability and hatch success in regulated rivers.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%