2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-7678-9_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Are High Altitude Natives So Strong at High Altitude? Nature vs. Nurture: Genetic Factors vs. Growth and Development

Abstract: Among high-altitude natives there is evidence of a general hypoxia tolerance leading to enhanced performance and/or increased capacity in several important domains. These domains likely include an enhanced physical work capacity, an enhanced reproductive capacity, and an ability to resist several common pathologies of chronic high-altitude exposure. The "strength" of the high-altitude native in this regard may have both a developmental and a genetic basis, although there is better evidence for the former (deve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increases in cold-and exercise-induced VȮ 2,max in highland deer mice observed by us and others appear to be greatest in hypoxic conditions, and are not as large in normoxic conditions at sea level, suggesting that highlanders are more resistant to the depressing effects of hypoxia on O 2 transport (Chappell and Snyder, 1984;Hayes, 1989a;Cheviron et al, 2012Cheviron et al, , 2013Lui et al, 2015). Similar differences exist in Andean and Tibetan human populations, in which exercise-induced VȮ 2,max is only elevated compared with lowland humans when tested at altitudes above ∼2500 m (Brutsaert, 2016). However, in many of these human studies, it has been hard to distinguish evolved genetic effects from effects of developmental environment and exercise training.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The increases in cold-and exercise-induced VȮ 2,max in highland deer mice observed by us and others appear to be greatest in hypoxic conditions, and are not as large in normoxic conditions at sea level, suggesting that highlanders are more resistant to the depressing effects of hypoxia on O 2 transport (Chappell and Snyder, 1984;Hayes, 1989a;Cheviron et al, 2012Cheviron et al, , 2013Lui et al, 2015). Similar differences exist in Andean and Tibetan human populations, in which exercise-induced VȮ 2,max is only elevated compared with lowland humans when tested at altitudes above ∼2500 m (Brutsaert, 2016). However, in many of these human studies, it has been hard to distinguish evolved genetic effects from effects of developmental environment and exercise training.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It has been difficult to determine whether these patterns of variation result from evolved differences or from environmentally induced plasticity (acclimatization, developmental plasticity, etc.) (Brutsaert, 2016;Laguë, 2017;Moore, 2017). Nevertheless, these intriguing results suggest that there may be convergent mechanisms for coping with hypoxia at high altitude within a given geographic region, but divergent mechanisms between species inhabiting different geographic regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4; Scott and Milsom 2007). This distinction between Andean geese and bar-headed geese is surprisingly similar to that between high-altitude human populations from South America and Asia: Andean humans have a blunted HVR, whereas Tibetans have an enhanced HVR compared with their lowland counterparts (Wu and Kayser 2006;Brutsaert 2016). The reason for this intriguing result is unclear, but it suggests that the selective advantage of the hypoxia response may differ between lineages or between distinct highaltitude regions.…”
Section: Milsom 2009)mentioning
confidence: 69%