2015
DOI: 10.1002/per.1982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Are Extraverts More Popular? Oral Fluency Mediates the Effect of Extraversion on Popularity in Middle Childhood

Abstract: In a sample of 7-to 8-year-old children (N = 760), we examined the associations between personality traits, oral fluency and sociometric popularity. Extending upon research conducted with older populations, we found parent ratings of extraversion at age 7 to predict popularity one year later. More importantly, we expected and found teacher-rated oral fluency to partially mediate the positive association between extraversion and popularity. This mediation effect was independent of psychometrically assessed work… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(175 reference statements)
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we did not find that lower levels of attention or approach predicted subsequent affiliation with antisocial peer-groups or inflated social self-perception, as was hypothesized by us and as others have found (Kendler et al, 2015;Li et al, 2016;Scholtens et al, 2012). Nor did we find that lower levels of approach were affiliated with lower levels of social preference among peers (Ilmarinen et al, 2015). The fact that, with the exception of Scholtens and colleagues (2012), none of the studies cited above controlled for children's antisocial behavior when examining developmental paths between temperament and peer-factors, may be a plausible explanation for our findings.…”
Section: Antisocial Behavior and Substance Usecontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Moreover, we did not find that lower levels of attention or approach predicted subsequent affiliation with antisocial peer-groups or inflated social self-perception, as was hypothesized by us and as others have found (Kendler et al, 2015;Li et al, 2016;Scholtens et al, 2012). Nor did we find that lower levels of approach were affiliated with lower levels of social preference among peers (Ilmarinen et al, 2015). The fact that, with the exception of Scholtens and colleagues (2012), none of the studies cited above controlled for children's antisocial behavior when examining developmental paths between temperament and peer-factors, may be a plausible explanation for our findings.…”
Section: Antisocial Behavior and Substance Usecontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…For example, there is some evidence that individuals who choose to participate in team sports score higher on extraversion compared to those who opt for individual sports (Eagleton, McKelvie, & de Man, 2007). Extraversion has been linked to increased popularity (Ilmarinen, Vainikainen, Verkasalo, & Lönnqvist, 2015), but was not controlled in this study.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Schaffhuser et al, 2014). Furthermore, social relationships between interaction partners, for example liking/friendship (e.g., Ackerman & Corretti, 2015;Ilmarinen, Vainikainen, Verkasalo, & Lönnqvist, 2015;Wilson et al, 2015) or attraction/romantic relationships (e.g., Asendorpf, Penke, & Back, 2011;Vater & Schröder-Abé, 2015), might also influence or moderate the effects. For example, one could imagine that attraction leads to sociable behavior for some people, while for others it results in reserved behavior.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%