Why are different estimates of the effective reproductive number so different? A case study on COVID-19 in Germany

Brockhaus, Elisabeth K.; Wolffram, Daniel; Stadler, Tanja; Osthege, Michael; Mitra, Tanmay; Littek, Jonas M.; Krymova, Ekaterina; Klesen, Anna J.; Huisman, Jana S.; Heyder, Stefan; Helleckes, Laura M.; Heiden, Matthias an der; Funk, Sebastian; Abbott, Sam; Bracher, Johannes

doi:10.1101/2023.04.27.23289109

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 35 publications

(50 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[15] Parameters chosen by users can also influence estimation accuracy, for instance, the time window length for temporal smoothing and the prior for R t [26]. Finally, EpiEstim's assumption of a Poisson likelihood may be a limitation in instances when data is substantially overdispersed [29,30].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimating the epidemic reproduction number from temporally aggregated incidence data: A statistical modelling approach and software tool

Nash,

Bhatt,

Cori

et al. 2023

PLoS Comput Biol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The time-varying reproduction number (Rt) is an important measure of epidemic transmissibility that directly informs policy decisions and the optimisation of control measures. EpiEstim is a widely used opensource software tool that uses case incidence and the serial interval (SI, time between symptoms in a case and their infector) to estimate Rt in real-time. The incidence and the SI distribution must be provided at the same temporal resolution, which can limit the applicability of EpiEstim and other similar methods, e.g. for contexts where the time window of incidence reporting is longer than the mean SI. In the EpiEstim R package, we implement an expectation-maximisation algorithm to reconstruct daily incidence from temporally aggregated data, from which Rt can then be estimated. We assess the validity of our method using an extensive simulation study and apply it to COVID-19 and influenza data. For all datasets, the influence of intra-weekly variability in reported data was mitigated by using aggregated weekly data. Rt estimated on weekly sliding windows using incidence reconstructed from weekly data was strongly correlated with estimates from the original daily data. The simulation study revealed that Rt was well estimated in all scenarios and regardless of the temporal aggregation of the data. In the presence of weekend effects, Rt estimates from reconstructed data were more successful at recovering the true value of Rt than those obtained from reported daily data. These results show that this novel method allows Rt to be successfully recovered from aggregated data using a simple approach with very few data requirements. Additionally, by removing administrative noise when daily incidence data are reconstructed, the accuracy of Rt estimates can be improved.

show abstract