The aim of this paper is to argue against the claim that the term "belief", as it functions in philosophical psychology, has natural-kind term semantics; this thesis is central to the famous Lycan-Stich argument against eliminative materialism. I will argue that the current debate concerning the discrepancy between the professed opinions and actions, especially the debate concerning the idea of aliefs, shows that the concept of belief is plastic and amenable to conceptual engineering. The plasticity and amenability to conceptual engineering of the concept of belief give us, in turn, a reason to doubt that "belief" functions in a way that is presupposed in the Lycan-Stich argument. Finally, I point to an alternative to both eliminativism and the natural kind view, namely the idea that we should treat belief as a human kind.