Why and when leader humility promotes constructive voice: a crossover of energy perspective

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to build a moderate mediation model to delineate the effects of leader humility on employee constructive voice behavior based on conservation of resources theory and crossover of resources model. Specifically, when a leader behaves with humility, the followers will be more likely to feel they receive psychological resources from their interactions with the leader (i.e. relational energy), and thus engage in more constructive voice behavior. In addition, this energizing effect only occurs when the leader is perceived as having higher apparent sincerity by their subordinates. Design/methodology/approach The research hypotheses of this study were empirically tested using multi-timepoint and multi-source (i.e. supervisors and subordinates) survey data in China. Study 1, based on data from 449 subordinates and 88 immediate supervisors, was conducted to test the proposed mediation effect. Study 2, based on data from 185 subordinates and 50 immediate supervisors, was conducted to replicate the findings of Study 1 and test the integrated model. Findings The results of Study 1 support the proposed mediation effect that leader humility positively predicts followers’ constructive voice behavior via boosting followers’ relational energy. The results of Study 2 replicate the findings of Study 1 and further indicate that leader humility is only positively related to perceived relational energy when a leader is perceived as having higher apparent sincerity by their subordinates. Practical implications This paper provides detailed instructions for business practitioners. First, given that employee constructive voice behavior is related to employee relational energy and is beneficial to organizations, leaders are encouraged to behave with humility when interacting with their subordinates. Second, from the perspective of human resource management, well-designed training programs can be used to help leaders to develop leader humility. Third, the findings of this paper call attention to a potential risk for humble leaders. Organizations should educate leaders on the potential negative consequences of false humility and encourage leader humility that will appear in leaders’ sincerity. Originality/value Overall, drawing on conservation of resources theory and crossover of resources model, this paper reveals that boosting relational energy is a mechanism via which humble leaders can shape employees’ voice behavior. Second, by examining the moderation effect of apparent sincerity of leaders from followers’ perspective, this paper suggests an actor–recipient perspective to identify the boundaries of the energizing mechanism. Third, the findings of this paper add to the knowledge on voice research by highlighting an additional source of energy for employee constructive voice behavior.

The voicer's reactions to voice: an examination of employee voice on perceived organizational status and subsequent innovative behavior in the workplace

“…A central argument throughout the aforementioned voice literature is that employee voice is critical for organizational efficiency, error correction and work process improvement (Morrison, 2014). Given the value of voice for organizations, researchers have paid much attention to and identified a range of antecedents that can promote or hinder voice engagement, such as employee characteristics, dispositional factors and leader style (Ma et al, 2020;Detert and Burris, 2007;Wilkinson et al, 2014). Yet in addition to antecedents to voice, it is also important to understand the outcomes and, in particular, the implications of voice for the employees.…”

The tipping point: mitigating the curvilinear effect of frontline service employee's perception of leadership humility on frontline service performance

“…Some studies (Ou et al, 2018;Owens et al, 2013Owens et al, , 2015 find that leadership humility fosters employee performance regardless of where the leaders sit in the organizational hierarchy, yet others argue that leadership humility does not always positively foster employee performance or engagement (e.g. Ma et al, 2019;Oc et al, 2015;Walters and Diab, 2016). These conflicting findings suggest that leadership humility does not appear to always have a positive linear relationship with employee performance, and the effect of leadership humility is more complex than it would be accounted for by zero-order correlations.…”

Overworked, friendless, and constrained, but also helpful: How workplace adversity prompts employees to use task conflict to suggest organizational improvements

“…Prior research has acknowledged a plethora of factors that may spur employee voice. Many of the studied factors focus on the relationships that employees have with organizational leaders, such that employee voice is more likely in the presence of leader member exchange (Duan et al, 2019), transformational leadership (Zhang & Inness, 2019), coaching leadership (Yuan et al, 2019), benevolent and moral leadership (Jia et al, 2020), supervisor-subordinate guanxi (Wang et al, 2019), leader interactional fairness (Tan et al, 2019), and leader humility (Ma et al, 2020). The extent to which employees voice their opinions is also fuelled by non-leader factors, such as their structural positions in intra-organizational networks (Venkataramani & Tangirala, 2010), experience of group cohesion (Kong et al, 2020), or organizational embeddedness (Ng & Lucianetti, 2018).…”