2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3845928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why and How Systematic Strategies Decay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first approach examines predictor profits in periods before and after the dissemination of research publicizing the trading strategies. If profits reflect mispricing and publication leads to investors learning about strategies and trading on them to exploit mispricing, currency excess return predictability should decline post publication (Falck et al, 2021;McLean and Pontiff, 2016;Chordia et al, 2014;Schwert, 2003;Cochrane, 1999). Consistent with mispricing as a source of predictability, we show that risk-adjusted payoffs associated with currency strategies significantly decrease after the academic research has been published and that post-publication declines are greater for strategies with economically or statistically larger in-sample profits and smaller limits to arbitrage.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The first approach examines predictor profits in periods before and after the dissemination of research publicizing the trading strategies. If profits reflect mispricing and publication leads to investors learning about strategies and trading on them to exploit mispricing, currency excess return predictability should decline post publication (Falck et al, 2021;McLean and Pontiff, 2016;Chordia et al, 2014;Schwert, 2003;Cochrane, 1999). Consistent with mispricing as a source of predictability, we show that risk-adjusted payoffs associated with currency strategies significantly decrease after the academic research has been published and that post-publication declines are greater for strategies with economically or statistically larger in-sample profits and smaller limits to arbitrage.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…15 The publication effect and the interaction terms involving in-sample profits are always negative and significant for profits gross and net of transaction costs using alternative samples with different sets of currencies (Table A9). 16 Tests using a combined proxy as in Falck et al (2021) also show no evidence of overfitting.…”
Section: Publication Effects Of Academic Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the second part of the analysis, we zoom in on a narrow window around the June 3 Prior work has identified many other mechanisms that may cause factor returns to decline: changes in liquidity (Khandani and Lo, 2011;Chordia, Subrahmanyam, and Tong, 2014;Lee and Ogden, 2015), and increased arbitrage activity (Marquering, Nisser, and Valla, 2006;Green, Hand, and Soliman, 2011;Hanson and Sunderam, 2013;McLean and Pontiff, 2016;Calluzzo, Moneta, and Topaloglu, 2019;Cho, 2020). Several studies propose that some factors may result from possible data-mining or overfitting (Harvey, Liu, and Zhu, 2016;Harvey, 2017;Hou, Xue, and Zhang, 2020;Huang, Song, and Xiang, 2020b;Falck, Rej, and Thesmar, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%