2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1016522319282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why and How Post-Mastectomy Edema should be Quantified in Patients with Breast Cancer

Abstract: In the present study, we advocate quantifying post-mastectomy edema in patients with breast cancer in millilitres and not in centimetre, contrarily to the usual routine practice. The water displacement and perimetric quantification methods exhibited both excellent reproducibility with an intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.99 and an accuracy coefficient < 0.3%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
23
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This method demonstrated excellent inter-and intra-observer reproducibility when compared to water displacement, which remains the gold standard [12].…”
Section: Data Collectedmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This method demonstrated excellent inter-and intra-observer reproducibility when compared to water displacement, which remains the gold standard [12].…”
Section: Data Collectedmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This method demonstrated excellent inter-and intra-observer reproducibility in comparison to water displacement which is considered the gold standard. [7][8][9] Participants, whose volume difference between the two arms was ‡5%, were considered as lymphedema-positive patients. Patients who had 5%-10%, 10%--20%, and ‡20% volume differences between two arms were considered as mild, moderate, and severe lymphedema.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lymphedema volume was calculated for each 5-cm segment by utilizing the formula for a truncated cone: H · (C2 + Cc + c2)/12p, H = height, C = circumference of the top of the cone, c = circumference of the base of the cone [9,10]. This method demonstrated excellent inter-and intra-observer reproducibility in comparison to water displacement, which is considered the gold standard [11,12].…”
Section: Data Collectedmentioning
confidence: 99%