2008
DOI: 10.1080/07399330701738226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why and According to What Consultation Profiles Do Female Sex Workers Consult Health Care Professionals? A Study Conducted in Laval, Québec

Abstract: We carried out a study to understand help-seeking behavior among female sex workers in order to bring adequate health care and services to this population at risk for sexually transmitted infection (STI) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmissions. Data were collected by means of questionnaires, focus groups, and in-depth individual interviews. Analysis reveals that the respondents are familiar with and have access to the health care system. Over 80% claimed to have consulted a health professional dur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…by the German STD society), screening for asymptomatic bacterial STIs, including pharyngeal and rectal swabs for Gonococci, or nucleic acid testing of urine or rectal swabs for Chlamydia, is thus rarely offered. It has been described repeatedly that GPs or infectious disease specialists tend to neglect sexual health care needs of at-risk patients or sexual minorities [6,21], beyond financial aspects. The discrepancy between over-testing HIV-positive gay men - even if presently at low risk for STIs - and not offering syphilis serology to MSM with many sexual partners is striking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by the German STD society), screening for asymptomatic bacterial STIs, including pharyngeal and rectal swabs for Gonococci, or nucleic acid testing of urine or rectal swabs for Chlamydia, is thus rarely offered. It has been described repeatedly that GPs or infectious disease specialists tend to neglect sexual health care needs of at-risk patients or sexual minorities [6,21], beyond financial aspects. The discrepancy between over-testing HIV-positive gay men - even if presently at low risk for STIs - and not offering syphilis serology to MSM with many sexual partners is striking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formal acceptance of sex work as a legitimate business activity might make it easier for sex workers to disclose their work to healthcare providers, and receive non-judgmental health services (Abel et al 2010;Nguyen et al 2008). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, there is a scarcity of research relating any benefits from “coming out” in health care settings for individuals engaged in sex work, such as those noted above for other discreditable groups (Corrigan et al, 2012; Fisher & Akman, 2002). Only two studies could be found linking benefits to post-disclosure of work status: Nguyen, Venne, Rodrigues, and Jacques (2008) found that study participants reported more comprehensive and continuous care from providers who portrayed a nonjudgmental attitude when their sex work was revealed, and Abel (2014) uncovered that disclosure to regular doctors led to more comprehensive check-ups for some study participants. There is thus a need for deeper understanding of the costs but also the benefits of disclosure and how sex workers, as agentic health care seekers, navigate divulging a potentially stigmatizing status in their specific socio-legal context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%