2020
DOI: 10.7249/pea237-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whose Story Wins: Rise of the Noosphere, Noopolitik, and Information-Age Statecraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Noopolitics is an information strategy concept for manipulating international processes through the media by forming the public's positive or negative attitude to the foreign and domestic policies of a state or a block of states to create a positive/negative image of ideas and promoted moral values (Noopolitic) (NIKONOV, 2013;RONFELDT, ARQUILLA, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noopolitics is an information strategy concept for manipulating international processes through the media by forming the public's positive or negative attitude to the foreign and domestic policies of a state or a block of states to create a positive/negative image of ideas and promoted moral values (Noopolitic) (NIKONOV, 2013;RONFELDT, ARQUILLA, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategic narratives provide a set of tools for understanding the world order and political agenda: ‘Strategic narrative is soft power in the twenty-first century’ (Roselle et al 2014 , p. 71). The reformulation of international relations in the post-COVID-19 world will depend to a great extent on ‘whose story wins’ (Ronfeldt and Arquilla 2020 ). Advances in production and distribution of the vaccine provide an opportunity to analyse how power is projected and how it influences geographical areas with the combination of economic aid and the delivery of medical supplies.…”
Section: Strategic Narratives In the Post-covid-19 Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, theories of what one might call a “Subverted Noosphere” are approximating the Anthropocene's attention to the radical disruption of ecosystems. However, the ecosystems at risk in a subverted Noosphere or an out‐of‐control infosphere are more typically our shared mental, social, and political spaces, and the disruption comes in the form of personal and institutional destabilization due to the unforeseen consequences of globalized electronic communication, such as filter bubbles or disinformation (Ronfeldt & Arquilla, 2020).…”
Section: Reconciling the Anthropocene And The Noospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to divergences in content and mood, the two paradigms are geographically divergent: the Anthropocene serves as a key concept for understanding anthropogenic global change among scholars and thinkers in Western Europe and the Americas (Hudson, 2014); meanwhile, the Noosphere is central to Eastern European scholars and scientists working on comparable topics (Bernstein, 2019; Ronfeldt & Arquilla, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%