2013
DOI: 10.1177/0001839213504403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whose Jobs Are These? The Impact of the Proportion of Female Managers on the Number of New Management Jobs Filled by Women versus Men

Abstract: In this paper, we examine the relationship between an organization’s proportion of female managers and the number of new management jobs initially filled by women versus men. We draw on theories of job differentiation, job change, and organizational demography to develop theory and predictions about this relationship and whether the relationship differs for jobs filled by female and male managers. Using data on a sample of New York City advertising agencies over a 13-year period, we find that the number of new… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Part of the explanation resides in female seniors being (stronger) role models to lower-ranked women in organizations, by providing motivation and information to junior women that they could also succeed, while junior men often take the possibility of success for granted. Similar results and explanations have been provided by other studies, either looking at promotion rates or gender wage gaps inside organizations (e.g., Cohen and Broschak, 2013;Cohen and Huffman, 2007). The fact that women in top hierarchies are typically an underrepresented minority may strengthen the ties with other women in the firm, and therefore explain why men and women may be differently affected by same-gender bosses (McGinn and Milkman, 2013; see also Reagans (2005) for a context where men represent the minority).…”
Section: Employee-boss Gender Match and (Female Versus Male) Employeesupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Part of the explanation resides in female seniors being (stronger) role models to lower-ranked women in organizations, by providing motivation and information to junior women that they could also succeed, while junior men often take the possibility of success for granted. Similar results and explanations have been provided by other studies, either looking at promotion rates or gender wage gaps inside organizations (e.g., Cohen and Broschak, 2013;Cohen and Huffman, 2007). The fact that women in top hierarchies are typically an underrepresented minority may strengthen the ties with other women in the firm, and therefore explain why men and women may be differently affected by same-gender bosses (McGinn and Milkman, 2013; see also Reagans (2005) for a context where men represent the minority).…”
Section: Employee-boss Gender Match and (Female Versus Male) Employeesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…First, because bosses face imperfect information about worker productivity, they may rely on certain group characteristics, such as gender, as signals of individual performance and ability. For this reason, female bosses (e.g., CEOs, managers, supervisors) might be better able at inferring other women's unobserved productivity, hence reducing statistical discrimination toward female workers (e.g., Cohen and Huffman, 2007;Cohen and Broschak, 2013;Smith et al, 2013;Hensvik, 2014). Second, theories of taste-based behavior of leaders also predict that a larger representation of women at top hierarchies may reduce a gender bias in the selection of employees, diminish gender wage gaps, and provide more opportunities for women to be promoted (Cardoso and Winter-Ebmer, 2010;Giuliano et al, 2011;Cohen and Broschak, 2013;Hensvik, 2014).…”
Section: Entrepreneurial Bosses Gender and Employees' Choices For Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Next, we assessed new TMT roles as being added when a job title appeared that had never before existed in the firm (see Cohen & Broschak, 2013). For example, the addition of a VP of sales title that had never before existed would be counted as a new TMT role.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%