1996
DOI: 10.2307/527053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whose Head on the Bath Temple-Pediment?

Abstract: NOTES difficult to determine. Though the name suggests that it ought to have been focused on the Highlands of Scotland, or at least situated north of the Forth, knowledge of the Caledonian forest before the campaigns of Agricola implies that it may have extended into the Southern Uplands. 170 In conclusion, though the process was neither synchronous nor universal, extensive deforestation was well underway across much of north Britain by the late Iron Age. Those areas which still retained their woodland cover w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 There is a fragment of another shell canopy (95915), perhaps from the side of the 19 Krier and Henrich 2012. 20 However, see Hind 1996 for identification as the giant Typhoeus.…”
Section: Stanwick Sculpture and Monuments By Martin Henigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 There is a fragment of another shell canopy (95915), perhaps from the side of the 19 Krier and Henrich 2012. 20 However, see Hind 1996 for identification as the giant Typhoeus.…”
Section: Stanwick Sculpture and Monuments By Martin Henigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 34 Hind (1996) suggests that it is the monster Typhoeus. However, Typhoeus’ story is known principally from Pindar, and is thus not only obscure but also very remote both geographically and chronologically from Bath. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%