2005
DOI: 10.1080/0144341042000301265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole‐school positive behaviour support: effects on student discipline problems and academic performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
170
0
11

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
170
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…This system is often characterised by the use of individual student behaviour support plans (Luiselli et al 2005) and has a number of critical components that are applied behaviour analytic (ABA) in origin: (1) consensusdriven behaviour expectations must be established; (2) critical interpersonal skills must be targeted; (3) there must be systematic positive reinforcement for meeting and exceeding performance criteria; (4) intervention efficacy must be monitored continuously through data collection and analysis; (5) all relevant parties (pupils, teachers, administrators and parents) must participate in the processes of behaviour change; (6) reactive, punitive and exclusionary strategies should be reduced in favour of a proactive, preventive and skillbuilding orientation. Preliminary outcome data suggest that the implementation of this system is associated with a decrease in school-wide problems, as well as the creation of a positive school climate (Cohen, Kincaid, and Childs 2008).…”
Section: Changing Teacher Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system is often characterised by the use of individual student behaviour support plans (Luiselli et al 2005) and has a number of critical components that are applied behaviour analytic (ABA) in origin: (1) consensusdriven behaviour expectations must be established; (2) critical interpersonal skills must be targeted; (3) there must be systematic positive reinforcement for meeting and exceeding performance criteria; (4) intervention efficacy must be monitored continuously through data collection and analysis; (5) all relevant parties (pupils, teachers, administrators and parents) must participate in the processes of behaviour change; (6) reactive, punitive and exclusionary strategies should be reduced in favour of a proactive, preventive and skillbuilding orientation. Preliminary outcome data suggest that the implementation of this system is associated with a decrease in school-wide problems, as well as the creation of a positive school climate (Cohen, Kincaid, and Childs 2008).…”
Section: Changing Teacher Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, disciplining learners has proved to be a mammoth task for schools especially in using punitive versus supportive disciplinary strategies. To ensure academic success and providing a safe learning environment, it is, therefore, essential for schools to establish effective discipline methods (Luiselli, Putnam, Handler & Feinberg, 2005). In a bid to maintain positive discipline, schools have adopted various strategies such as communication, modelling positive behaviour, training of staff and parents, positive reinforcement and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Luiselli, Putnam, Handler, and Feinberg (2005), undisciplined attitude done by office referrals which refer to teachers and school administrators, directly cause discipline problem on students. For instance, students may also come late to the class as their teachers ever done several times.…”
Section: Personal Competencementioning
confidence: 99%