2015
DOI: 10.1614/ws-d-14-00019.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-Plant and Seed Bioassays for Resistance Confirmation

Abstract: Much of agriculture-related research today involves weed resistance to herbicides. Resistance evolution is perhaps the strongest driver for the quest for new herbicide targets, novel weed intervention technologies, and the promotion of best management practices for sustainable crop production (Burgos et al., 2006; Norsworthy et al. 2012; Vencill et al. 2012). To date, 222 weedy species collectively have evolved resistance to 150 herbicides representing 21 sites of action (Heap 2014). For decades, scientists ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A dose-response experiment not only determines the discriminating dose for large-scale resistance testing as mentioned in the previous section, but also evaluates the highest dose that a population can tolerate and to obtain clues for the potential resistance mechanism(s). High resistance level may not only indicate targeted genetic point mutation, but also could be indicative of nontarget site resistance mechanism (Burgos et al, 2015). The R/S ratios of LD xx or GR xx values are used to compare the magnitude of resistance of different populations (Burgos et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dose-response experiment not only determines the discriminating dose for large-scale resistance testing as mentioned in the previous section, but also evaluates the highest dose that a population can tolerate and to obtain clues for the potential resistance mechanism(s). High resistance level may not only indicate targeted genetic point mutation, but also could be indicative of nontarget site resistance mechanism (Burgos et al, 2015). The R/S ratios of LD xx or GR xx values are used to compare the magnitude of resistance of different populations (Burgos et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the reason for the application recommendation of OnDutyℱ WG herbicide in commercial IMI-rice fields, where it must be applied as pre-emergence or early post-emergence to the plants (preferably 0-5-day after sowing, and not exceed 7-day after sowing or 1-2-leaf stage). Seed bioassay was conducted to evaluate the pre-emergence activity of the IMI-herbicides premix to weedy rice populations and rice varieties, while whole-plant dose response experiment allowed us to confirm resistance of the populations with post-emergence activity [33]. Hence, both experiments aimed to evaluate the occurrence and level of resistance of weedy rice populations and rice varieties to imazapic and imazapyr that best applied as pre- and early post-emergence herbicides, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each population, the control treatment (without herbicide solution) with 5 mL distilled water was also considered. Then, the Petri dishes were placed in an incubator at 25 ‱ C. After seven days, the shoot lengths of the coleoptiles in all of the seedlings were measured and expressed as the percentage of the shoot length of coleoptile compared to the control [13].…”
Section: Seed Bioassaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each replicate pot contained five plants. Four weeks after sowing, at the three-to-four-leaf stage (as BBCH scale in [13][14], herbicides were applied at different rates using a calibrated sprayer with a flat-fan nozzle (TeeJet 8001) to deliver 250 L ha −1 of spray solution at 200 kPa. One untreated control (without herbicide application) for each population has been used.…”
Section: Whole Plant Dose-response Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%