) does not cluster with other members of the B. amyloliquefaciens taxon. Instead, it clusters well within a clade of strains that are assigned to B. methylotrophicus, including the type strain of that species. Therefore, we propose that the subspecies B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum should be reclassified as a later heterotypic synonym of B. methylotrophicus.
INTRODUCTIONBacillus methylotrophicus, isolated from rice rhizosphere soil (Korea), was recently described by Madhaiyan et al. (2010). The type strain, KACC 13105 T (5CBMB205 T ), was found to be closely related to members of the Bacillus subtilis species complex (see Rooney et al., 2009, for a recent review of this species complex), and showed 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity values ranging from 98.2 to 99.2 %. The strain was also shown to be a methylotrophic organism capable of utilizing methanol, triethylamine and ethanol as a sole carbon source.Bacillus amyloliquefaciens was recognized as a distinct species in 1987 and was originally described as a producer of extracellular enzymes (Priest et al., 1987). The species was recently divided into two subspecies, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum, based on complete genome comparisons . Strains of the B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum clade are plant-associated isolates and typically isolated from the soil or rhizosphere of plants Madhaiyan et al., 2010;Palazzini et al., 2007; Rückert et al., 2011;Schisler et al., 2002). These strains were typically isolated as biological control agents or plant growth promoters.Over the past decade, considerable interest has been shown in developing B. methylotrophicus and B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum strains as biological control agents and plant growth promoters (Ongena & Jacques, 2008; Pérez-García et al., 2011;Shan et al., 2013;Sharma & Satyanarayana, 2013;Shi et al., 2014). In recent years, interest in understanding the mode of action of these strains has led to many genomes being published for these strains (Blom et al., 2012;Cai et al., 2014;Dunlap et al., 2013;Geng et al., 2011; Hao et al., 2012; Lefort et al., 2014; Manzoor et al., 2013;Nelson et al., 2014;Niazi et al., 2014a T was cultured in tryptone-glucose-yeast extract media to early stationary phase (*24 h) and harvested by centrifugation. DNA extraction was performed on the pelleted bacterial biomass using a QIAcube instrument with a QIAmp DNA mini QIAcube kit (QIAGEN). The total genomic DNA extraction was subsequently fragmented to 400 bp using a bioruptor (Diagenode) and size-selected using an E-gel apparatus (Life Technologies). Sequencing adapters were ligated using an Ion Express Plus Fragment Library kit (Life Technologies). Emulsion PCR to incorporate the DNA fragment library to the sequencing beads was performed using the Ion OneTouch instrument with an Ion OneTouch System Template kit (Life Technologies). The library sample was finally sequenced on an Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine using an Ion 318 chip and t...