2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole genome sequence typing and microarray profiling of nasal and blood stream methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates: Clues to phylogeny and invasiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The knowledge of epidemiological links between isolates of our study cohort made us confident that the genomic outbreak view was more plausible and therefore more reliable than MLVA type clustering. While in line with previous reports spa typing concurred with WGS-based phylogeny 29,30 , it lacked the required resolution as exemplified by the five separate outbreaks that were identified under spa type t091 using comparative genomics. www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Because our specified genomic methods including particular SNP confidence requirements have not been applied before, the selected SNP threshold cannot be directly compared to that in other genomic outbreak studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The knowledge of epidemiological links between isolates of our study cohort made us confident that the genomic outbreak view was more plausible and therefore more reliable than MLVA type clustering. While in line with previous reports spa typing concurred with WGS-based phylogeny 29,30 , it lacked the required resolution as exemplified by the five separate outbreaks that were identified under spa type t091 using comparative genomics. www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Because our specified genomic methods including particular SNP confidence requirements have not been applied before, the selected SNP threshold cannot be directly compared to that in other genomic outbreak studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…A relative limitation of our genomic method is that Illumina sequencing followed by de novo assembly does not allow for complete reconstruction of bacterial genomes, partly at the expense of repetitive elements. Although this issue can be overcome by long-read sequencing technologies such as Oxford Nanopore [10] or Pacific Biosciences single-molecule real-time sequencing [10,30], it is unsure whether genetic information from such complex regions would improve outbreak tracing. Although the genomic analyses as performed in this initial study are computationally demanding, they served well for sorting unresolved transmission chains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge of epidemiological links between isolates of our study cohort made us confident that the genomic outbreak view was more plausible and therefore more reliable than MLVA type clustering. While in line with previous reports Spa typing concurred with WGS-based phylogeny (26,27), it lacked the required resolution as exemplified by the five separate outbreaks that were identified under spa type t091 using comparative genomics. Because our specified genomic methods including particular SNP confidence requirements have not been applied before, the selected SNP threshold cannot be directly compared to that in other genomic outbreak studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Spa typing identified a total of 20 different spa types, with t003 being the most frequently represented type, and t504 genotype also being relatively frequent; the latter being a very typical regional strain closely related to the predominant t003 [ 49 ]. Both spa types encomprise 76% of the MRSA isolates recovered while other spa types were only sparsely encountered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%