2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23665-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-genome microsynteny-based phylogeny of angiosperms

Abstract: Plant genomes vary greatly in size, organization, and architecture. Such structural differences may be highly relevant for inference of genome evolution dynamics and phylogeny. Indeed, microsynteny—the conservation of local gene content and order—is recognized as a valuable source of phylogenetic information, but its use for the inference of large phylogenies has been limited. Here, by combining synteny network analysis, matrix representation, and maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference, we provide a way to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

6
42
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
6
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These works support the prevalence of duplicates and innovative potential as proposed more than fifty years ago by Ohno [14]. Since then, the molecular mechanisms behind this innovative potential and duplicate retention have become the target of many other researchers, involving the study of transcriptomic divergence between copies, functional specialization, adaptive potential, and evolvability of duplicates, among other parameters in all life kingdoms [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Some of these latest works show a relationship between duplicate transcriptional divergence and transcriptional plasticity in response to environmental challenges, which may link the evolvability of duplicates and their functional innovative potential in yeasts [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…These works support the prevalence of duplicates and innovative potential as proposed more than fifty years ago by Ohno [14]. Since then, the molecular mechanisms behind this innovative potential and duplicate retention have become the target of many other researchers, involving the study of transcriptomic divergence between copies, functional specialization, adaptive potential, and evolvability of duplicates, among other parameters in all life kingdoms [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Some of these latest works show a relationship between duplicate transcriptional divergence and transcriptional plasticity in response to environmental challenges, which may link the evolvability of duplicates and their functional innovative potential in yeasts [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In phylogenetics, such shared derived character is often used to define a monophyletic group, and thus in this case for magnoliids and monocots to share a common ancestor. Interestingly, a similar observation was made recently by Zhao et al 16 who also used collinearity and (micro)synteny information to infer phylogenetic relationships within angiosperms. Using a 'character matrix' derived from a network representation of pairwise (micro)synteny relations, and maximum likelihood inference, Zhao et al 16 found monocots and magnoliids also to be sister groups, to the exclusion of eudicots, and attributed the clustering of magnoliids and monocots to some syntenic blocks -other than the ones discovered by Qin et al 5 -that only seemed to exist in magnoliids and monocots.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…Interestingly, a similar observation was made recently by Zhao et al 16 who also used collinearity and (micro)synteny information to infer phylogenetic relationships within angiosperms. Using a 'character matrix' derived from a network representation of pairwise (micro)synteny relations, and maximum likelihood inference, Zhao et al 16 found monocots and magnoliids also to be sister groups, to the exclusion of eudicots, and attributed the clustering of magnoliids and monocots to some syntenic blocks -other than the ones discovered by Qin et al 5 -that only seemed to exist in magnoliids and monocots. Again, as in the findings of Qin et al 5 , alternative explanations could not completely be ruled out, but both findings are worthy of further investigation.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…Local gene order has been conserved across animal phyla over vast evolutionary time spans, and is referred to as microsynteny [ 1 5 ]. However, little is known about the loss of ancestrally inherited microsyntenies and the emergence of novel microsyntenies, due to genome rearrangements, gene gains and/or gene losses [ 1 , 6 8 ]. Determining the node of microsynteny loss or emergence can provide insights into the evolution of animal genome architecture and the extent of microsynteny conservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%