Whole Complementary and Alternative Medical Systems and Complexity: Creating Collaborative Relationships

Abstract

In recent years, investigators have discovered significant limitations in applying biomedical cause-effect assumptions and using conventional efficacy study designs to assess the clinical outcomes of whole systems of complementary and alternative medicine (WS-CAM). A group of WS-CAM researchers has been working collaboratively since 2001 to address the limitations of studies evaluating WS-CAM and discern ways to conduct research that would capture the complexity of such systems and the synergistic effects between the various elements of the system and would take into account treatment individualization and/or the patient-centered nature of treatment systems. In 2009, 14 complexity scientists from systems biology, psychology and the social sciences were invited to attend a workshop with these CAM scientists to (a) identify and discuss analytical techniques that can be used to study phenomena from a complex/nonlinear dynamical sciences perspective, (b) establish working relationships with these researchers, and (c) develop working research projects/ protocols to collaboratively study patient-centered responses to CAM treatments. This paper provides an overview of the workshop goals and outcomes, introducing this special issue of Forschende Komplementärmedizin.

Medicina Tradicional Complementar e Integrativa: desafios para construir um modelo de avaliação do cuidado

“…TCIM is a diverse set of modes of care, and its complexity challenges the traditional models of health evaluation [6][7] . Both the process of illness and the care present different subjectivities, emotions, values and sociocultural perspectives between user and professional that interfere in the success of the process 35 . In this case, methodological plurality and the emphasis on qualitative studies are necessary.…”

Are Allopathic and Holistic Medicine Incommensurable?

“…Thus, there is little a priori confidence in population benefit for most interventions. The emergence of CAM brings forward the need for additional methods of quality research in order to be able to increase the external validity of medical practices [38,39]. As a result, quality research methods in terms of formal case studies (FCSs) have emerged and gradually begin to find favor in medicine.…”

Challenges and Opportunities Faced by Biofield Practitioners in Global Health and Medicine: A White Paper

“… 29 Several organizations and workgroups have addressed the scientific development of theory-driven research and/or education. 30 , 31 AIHM's mandate is to foster transformation of healthcare and global health creation through education, research, and leadership, based on the core philosophies and values of IHM. This mandate will enable AIHM to become a leading forum for future expansion on transdisciplinary scientific work and education about the biofield.…”