Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Whole brain radiotherapy for the treatment of multiple brain metastases
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
12
7
3
0
Citation Types
0
22
0
2
Year Published
Range
2007
20072023
2023Publication Types
Select...
16
2
1
Relationship
0
19
Authors
Journals
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
References 17 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Furthermore, from a pragmatic standpoint, whether or not patients died from brain metastases or EC disease does not minimize the important finding that certain groups seem to benefit more from WBRT than others. Consequently, we are less likely to view controlled extracranial disease as a filter preventing consideration of aggressive or WBRT approaches [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Furthermore, from a pragmatic standpoint, whether or not patients died from brain metastases or EC disease does not minimize the important finding that certain groups seem to benefit more from WBRT than others. Consequently, we are less likely to view controlled extracranial disease as a filter preventing consideration of aggressive or WBRT approaches [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…We report the first large, consecutive series of patients with CPMs in whom SRS was used as the sole or principal therapeutic modality. For several decades, standard treatment of most patients with brain metastasis has been WBRT, alone or, in selected patients, after surgical resection (3,22,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29). Although these modalities have provided symptomatic relief, survival after treatment was 4-12 months on average and in that minority with prolonged survival, cognitive, and behavioral decline was not uncommon.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these modalities have provided symptomatic relief, survival after treatment was 4-12 months on average and in that minority with prolonged survival, cognitive, and behavioral decline was not uncommon. Although surgery, performed in selected patients, may improve survival, the two prospective trials to demonstrate an advantage for surgery with WBRT compared to WBRT alone did not address the difficulties of treating patients with more than one lesion or lesions in eloquent or less accessible areas of the brain, including the ventricular system (3,22,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45][46]. Similarly, patients with lesions deep in the brain, in eloquent areas, or with multiple tumors are frequently excluded as candidates for surgery because of the potential for injury of normal, intervening neural structures, which may sometimes lead physicians to prefer WBRT over SRS as well (2,3,(27)(28)(29). Most surgical approaches to the lateral and third ventricles require either a transcortical or transcallosal approach and lesions in the fourth ventricle often require splitting the cerebellar vermis, which may increase operative morbidity (2,10).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Subjects with multiple BMs (generally defined as more than four lesions) do not benefit from surgical resection. In these cases the optimal therapy is to deliver WBRT, with the most commonly used schedule being 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions [4]. With this therapy, up to 50% of cases achieve an improvement in neurologic symptoms and 50-70% of patients have a RR [19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Furthermore, from a pragmatic standpoint, whether or not patients died from brain metastases or EC disease does not minimize the important finding that certain groups seem to benefit more from WBRT than others. Consequently, we are less likely to view controlled extracranial disease as a filter preventing consideration of aggressive or WBRT approaches [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…We report the first large, consecutive series of patients with CPMs in whom SRS was used as the sole or principal therapeutic modality. For several decades, standard treatment of most patients with brain metastasis has been WBRT, alone or, in selected patients, after surgical resection (3,22,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29). Although these modalities have provided symptomatic relief, survival after treatment was 4-12 months on average and in that minority with prolonged survival, cognitive, and behavioral decline was not uncommon.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these modalities have provided symptomatic relief, survival after treatment was 4-12 months on average and in that minority with prolonged survival, cognitive, and behavioral decline was not uncommon. Although surgery, performed in selected patients, may improve survival, the two prospective trials to demonstrate an advantage for surgery with WBRT compared to WBRT alone did not address the difficulties of treating patients with more than one lesion or lesions in eloquent or less accessible areas of the brain, including the ventricular system (3,22,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45][46]. Similarly, patients with lesions deep in the brain, in eloquent areas, or with multiple tumors are frequently excluded as candidates for surgery because of the potential for injury of normal, intervening neural structures, which may sometimes lead physicians to prefer WBRT over SRS as well (2,3,(27)(28)(29). Most surgical approaches to the lateral and third ventricles require either a transcortical or transcallosal approach and lesions in the fourth ventricle often require splitting the cerebellar vermis, which may increase operative morbidity (2,10).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Subjects with multiple BMs (generally defined as more than four lesions) do not benefit from surgical resection. In these cases the optimal therapy is to deliver WBRT, with the most commonly used schedule being 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions [4]. With this therapy, up to 50% of cases achieve an improvement in neurologic symptoms and 50-70% of patients have a RR [19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Furthermore, from a pragmatic standpoint, whether or not patients died from brain metastases or EC disease does not minimize the important finding that certain groups seem to benefit more from WBRT than others. Consequently, we are less likely to view controlled extracranial disease as a filter preventing consideration of aggressive or WBRT approaches [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…We report the first large, consecutive series of patients with CPMs in whom SRS was used as the sole or principal therapeutic modality. For several decades, standard treatment of most patients with brain metastasis has been WBRT, alone or, in selected patients, after surgical resection (3,22,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29). Although these modalities have provided symptomatic relief, survival after treatment was 4-12 months on average and in that minority with prolonged survival, cognitive, and behavioral decline was not uncommon.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these modalities have provided symptomatic relief, survival after treatment was 4-12 months on average and in that minority with prolonged survival, cognitive, and behavioral decline was not uncommon. Although surgery, performed in selected patients, may improve survival, the two prospective trials to demonstrate an advantage for surgery with WBRT compared to WBRT alone did not address the difficulties of treating patients with more than one lesion or lesions in eloquent or less accessible areas of the brain, including the ventricular system (3,22,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45][46]. Similarly, patients with lesions deep in the brain, in eloquent areas, or with multiple tumors are frequently excluded as candidates for surgery because of the potential for injury of normal, intervening neural structures, which may sometimes lead physicians to prefer WBRT over SRS as well (2,3,(27)(28)(29). Most surgical approaches to the lateral and third ventricles require either a transcortical or transcallosal approach and lesions in the fourth ventricle often require splitting the cerebellar vermis, which may increase operative morbidity (2,10).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Subjects with multiple BMs (generally defined as more than four lesions) do not benefit from surgical resection. In these cases the optimal therapy is to deliver WBRT, with the most commonly used schedule being 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions [4]. With this therapy, up to 50% of cases achieve an improvement in neurologic symptoms and 50-70% of patients have a RR [19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%