“…Automated parcellation has been shown to remove manual bias, thus increasing consistency and comparability across studies and sites (Buckner et al, 2004; Hsu et al, 2002). We are only concerned with those methods that provide at a minimum the lobes of the cerebellum; hence methods like FreeSurfer (Dale et al, 1999; Fischl et al, 2004; Reuter and Fischl, 2011; Fischl, 2012), BrainSuite (Shattuck et al, 2001; Shattuck and Leahy, 2002; Shattuck et al, 2008), TOADS (Bazin and Pham, 2008; Shiee et al, 2010), CRUISE (Tosun et al, 2006; Landman et al, 2013), CRUISE+ (Shiee et al, 2014), MA-CRUISE (Huo et al, 2016a,b), and others (Carass et al, 2017c; Desikan et al, 2006; Guo et al, 2017; Ledig et al, 2015; Liu et al, 2012; Roy et al, 2015; Shao et al, 2018; Shiee et al, 2011; Tomas-Fernandez and Warfield, 2015; Van Leemput et al, 1999; Zhang et al, 2001; Zhao et al, 2017) that only provide tissue classes or coarse parcellations of the cerebellum are not directly relevant unless used in combination with other tools. The first published method that provided a fully automated parcellation of the cerebellar lobules was SUIT (Diedrichsen, 2006); the method used a spatially unbiased template of the human cerebellum that when registered with a subject image provided the parcellation.…”