1997
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/8.suppl_1.s57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) for diagnosis of residual mass in patients with lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
18
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results showed a one-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 95% for the FDG-PET negative group compared with 40% for the FDG-PET positive group. These and other similar findings are important in making management decisions (De Wit et al, 1997;Jerusalem et al, 1999;Cremerius et al, 2001;Weihrauch et al, 2003). They suggest that any HL patient with a residual mediastinal mass who has a negative FDG-PET scan is unlikely to relapse within 12 months, if ever, and therefore offers reassurance.…”
Section: Hodgkin Lymphomamentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Their results showed a one-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 95% for the FDG-PET negative group compared with 40% for the FDG-PET positive group. These and other similar findings are important in making management decisions (De Wit et al, 1997;Jerusalem et al, 1999;Cremerius et al, 2001;Weihrauch et al, 2003). They suggest that any HL patient with a residual mediastinal mass who has a negative FDG-PET scan is unlikely to relapse within 12 months, if ever, and therefore offers reassurance.…”
Section: Hodgkin Lymphomamentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has become a standard imaging test in the management of lymphoma in both initial staging [1,2] and response assessment [3][4][5][6]. Response criteria that incorporate FDG-PET can better predict the prognosis than the original International Workshop Criteria [7,8], and revised response criteria for lymphoma using FDG-PET have been published [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biopsy is potentially morbid, and is not standardly used. ͓F-18͔-2-Fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has proven useful in the noninvasive diagnosis of pathologic lymphadenopathy in other disease sites, including the mediastinum in non-small cell lung cancer 15,16 and lymphoma, 17 and in staging the axilla in breast cancer. 18,19 To determine the potential utility of FDG-PET in diagnosing IM nodal metastases, we undertook a retrospective review of 28 consecutive patients with locally advanced breast cancer from November 1995 to July 1999 who underwent an FDG-PET scan prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%