1997
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.169.6.9393189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-body positron emission tomography: normal variations, pitfalls, and technical considerations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
45
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that individual differences can also be present within study subjects (Engel et al 1996;Gordon et al, 1997;Ramos et al 2001;Tan and Ong 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that individual differences can also be present within study subjects (Engel et al 1996;Gordon et al, 1997;Ramos et al 2001;Tan and Ong 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PET findings were assessed according to the criteria, which we defined, due to lack of established criteria. The main difficulty in FDG-PET diagnosis of stomach cancer is physiological uptake in the stomach (Cook et al, 1996;Gordon et al, 1997;Shreve et al, 1999;Koga et al, 2003), but there was no cancer subject in whom we had difficulty in differentiating physiological uptake from cancer lesions. Nevertheless, it is possible that there were tiny cancers overlooked due to significant FDG background uptake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there are no established criteria for assessing FDG-PET findings, we determined the following criteria based on previous reports (Cook et al, 1996;Gordon et al, 1997;Shreve et al, 1999;Koga et al, 2003): (1) positive pattern 1 -spotty or focal accumulation that was stronger than the uptake in the liver ( Figure 1A); positive pattern 2 -any accumulation in the area of the lower stomach ( Figure 1B). This category was based on a report by Koga et al (2003), suggesting that physiological gastric FDG uptake is significantly higher at the oral end than the anal end, and that a stronger gastric FDG uptake at the anal end might therefore be suggestive of a pathological uptake.…”
Section: Assessment Of Fdg-pet Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…검사 환자의 0.6-3.3% 정도로 보고되었으며 [8]- [11] 자가 면역 갑상선 질환(autoimmune thyroid disease)과 관련 있음을 보고하였다 [12]- [15] .…”
Section: F-fdg 갑상선 섭취 증가는 Pet/ctunclassified