2009
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.08.1633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-Body MRI Versus PET in Assessment of Multiple Myeloma Disease Activity

Abstract: Whole-body MRI performed better than PET in the assessment of disease activity, having a higher sensitivity and specificity. The positive predictive value of whole-body MRI in the assessment of active disease was high at 88%. When used in combination and with concordant findings, PET and whole-body MRI were found to have a specificity and positive predictive value of 100%, which may be of value to clinicians assessing the effectiveness of aggressive and expensive treatment regimens.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, 18 studies involving 798 patients were included in this systematic review (Figure 1). 3,4,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] There was no disagreement between the reviewers regarding the inclusion of the articles. The characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, 18 studies involving 798 patients were included in this systematic review (Figure 1). 3,4,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] There was no disagreement between the reviewers regarding the inclusion of the articles. The characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If present, EMD was described by location, size, number, and SUV (SUV-EMD). Shortt, 2009 Disease activity was assessed on attenuation-corrected PET images with a maximal SUV of >2.5 denoting 18 FDG-avid lesions. Durie, 2002 All areas of focal uptake were interpreted as positive for myeloma unless they were on sites of known accumulation, including the kidney and bladder, gastrointestinal tract, and certain skeletal areas showing symmetric joint uptake.…”
Section: Fdg Pet or Pet-ct In Response Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,[12][13][14] MRI has a sensitivity of 68%, a specificity of 83%, a positive predictive value of 88% and is superior to PET-CT. 15 Furthermore, the development of fast sequences allows MRI to be performed as a whole-body protocol (wb-MRI), replacing the use of spinal MRI alone. 16 Focal lesions and diffuse tumor cell infiltration detected by wb-MRI have been demonstrated to be of prognostic significance for predicting progression free and overall survival in monoclonal plasma cell diseases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some earlier studies, qualitative reading of FDG PET positivity was used in MM; in these, the examination was considered positive for MM if FDG uptake was greater than the background level [5,6] . However, in most papers, semiquantitative parameters -mostly SUVmax (maximum standardized uptake value) with a cutoff value of 2.5 -were used for the characterization of pathological FDG uptake in MM patients [7][8][9][10] . Based on a recent paper, the presence of extramedullary disease (EMD), the initial SUVmax and the number of focal lesions (FL), all of which as evaluated by FDG PET/CT imaging, are deemed to be strong prognostic parameters at staging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some earlier studies, the FDG PET/CT was considered positive for MM if FDG uptake was greater than the background level [5,6] . However, in most papers, pathological FDG uptake is characterized by SUVmax, and SUVmax >2.5 or SUVmax ≥2.5 is considered to be abnormal and indicate a site of active disease [7][8][9][10] . Based on some recent studies, SUVmax >4.2 seems to be the best cutoff level to determine the positivity of FDG PET/CT [11,19] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%