2016
DOI: 10.5960/dzsm.2016.246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-Body Electromyostimulation – The Need for Common Sense! Rationale and Guideline for a Safe and Effective Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
80
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…EMS suits used in this study enabled the simultaneous activation of eight pairs of muscle groups (both upper legs, both upper arms, buttocks, abdomen, chest, lower back, upper back, and latissimus dorsi) with selectable intensities for each region. Based on recommendations from available literature [9,21,[29][30][31], the stimulation frequency was selected at 85 Hz, the impulse-width at 350 µs, the impulse-rise as a rectangular application, and variable electrostimulation intensities relative to the maximum peak voltage. This study used 1 MT (maximal tolerance) as the maximum peak voltage, similar to calculating the maximal voluntary contraction as one maximal repetition [13].…”
Section: Exercises With Electromyostimulation Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMS suits used in this study enabled the simultaneous activation of eight pairs of muscle groups (both upper legs, both upper arms, buttocks, abdomen, chest, lower back, upper back, and latissimus dorsi) with selectable intensities for each region. Based on recommendations from available literature [9,21,[29][30][31], the stimulation frequency was selected at 85 Hz, the impulse-width at 350 µs, the impulse-rise as a rectangular application, and variable electrostimulation intensities relative to the maximum peak voltage. This study used 1 MT (maximal tolerance) as the maximum peak voltage, similar to calculating the maximal voluntary contraction as one maximal repetition [13].…”
Section: Exercises With Electromyostimulation Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first assessment was conducted in Seoul Song-Do Hospital from July 7 to 8, 2017, and the second and third assessments were conducted in the same hospital from July 21 to 22 and from August 4 to 5, respectively. The program lasted for 6 weeks, similar to the duration of previous studies [2,10,[41][42][43][44]. However, the assessments were performed every 2 weeks for 6 weeks.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on recommendations from available literature, the stimulation frequency was selected at 85 Hz, the impulse-width at 350 microseconds, the impulserise as a rectangular application, and variable electrostimulation intensities relative to the maximum peak voltage (160 V). Impulse duration was 6 s with a 4-s break between impulses [2,8,41,43,44]. For each group, a qualified instructor conducted 20-minute WB-EMS sessions 3 times a week on two non-consecutive days to allow for a rest interval of 48 hours between each session.…”
Section: Category Criteria # Degree 1 Low Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Da dieses kombinierte Training meist mehrmals je Woche eingesetzt wird und die Problematik hoher CK-und Myoglobin-Konzentration nach WB-EMS Applikation trotz intensiver Beforschung (u. a. [5]) und korrespondierender Richtlinien [6] auch aktuell wieder heftig diskutiert wird [7,8], erscheint eine Einschätzung der muskulären Beanspruchung nach unterschiedlichen WB-EMS Protokollen sicher hilfreich, um weitere Empfehlungen aussprechen zu können. Ziel des vorliegenden Beitrags war es daher, eine Einschätzung der muskulären Beanspruchung (a) eines ausdauerorientierten kontinuierlichen WB-EMS Protokolls (superimposed WB-EMS) mit unterschiedlicher Stimulationsfrequenz (7 vs. 85 Hz) und (b) eines kraftorientierten, intermittierenden WB-EMS-Protokolls (85 Hz) vorzulegen.…”
Section: Einführungunclassified
“…Hohe Kreatinkinase-Konzentrationen nach WB-EMS werden insbesondere nach Erstapplikation mit exzessiver Impulsintensität berichtet [15]. Auch die vorliegende Untersuchung zeigte in diesem Kollektiv ohne jede vorherige WB-EMS Konditionierung nach hochintensivem, aber nicht ausbelastetem WB-EMS Protokoll CK-Konzentrationen (9055 ± 6424 IE/l) 5 im Bereich einer moderaten Rhabdomyolyse 6 , [19]. Die intraindividuelle Streuung der CK Werte liegt dabei sehr hoch (854-16621 IE/l), ein Umstand, der u. a. genetisch bedingt ist [20], und zu einer Einteilung in unterschiedliche "Respondertypen" (low vs. moderate vs. high) führte [20,21].…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified