2014
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13131529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Assessment of Treatment Response in Myeloma

Abstract: FRCP, FRCP Nandita M. deSouza, MD, FRCP, FRCR Purpose:To determine the feasibility of whole-body diffusionweighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for assessment of treatment response in myeloma. Materials and Methods:This prospective single-institution study was HIPAAcompliant with local research ethics committee approval. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject. Eight healthy volunteers (cohort 1a) and seven myeloma patients (cohort 1b) were imaged twice to assess repeatability of quanti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
142
2
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
11
142
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant difference in the specificity and accuracy was observed between the two steps for reader 2 and an added value of 84 % (16/19) in indeterminate lesions for reader 2. We observed excellent interobserver agreement in the measurement of ADC, consistent with a recent report by Giles et al [23]. There has been no consensus on which DWI parameters are optimal for evaluating soft tissue tumours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A significant difference in the specificity and accuracy was observed between the two steps for reader 2 and an added value of 84 % (16/19) in indeterminate lesions for reader 2. We observed excellent interobserver agreement in the measurement of ADC, consistent with a recent report by Giles et al [23]. There has been no consensus on which DWI parameters are optimal for evaluating soft tissue tumours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Conversely, it was able to reveal a faster normalization of the imaging findings in patients achieving a complete response or a very good partial response [44]. Also, a preliminary WBDW MRI study for the assessment of treatment response, carried out in a limited number of MM patients, indicates that WBDW is a repeatable and quantifiable imaging technique [45]. However, no comparative reports of the diagnostic performance between FDG PET/CT and WBDW in the same patients before and after therapy are so far available.…”
Section: Response To Therapy and Prognostic Evaluation In Overt MMmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Despite promising results concerning the application of ADC as MRI biomarker for monitoring response in various soft tissue and skeletal tumours (Punwani et al , 2010; Giles et al , 2014), generalization of ADC remains challenging (Koh et al , 2011). ADC quantitation could be affected by several factors, such as number and choices of b values, mathematical model for data fitting, software for data analysis and choices of applied sequence parameters (Koh et al , 2011; Celik, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, functional MRI techniques, such as contrast enhanced (CE) (Lin et al , 2010), DW imaging (DWI) (Hillengass et al , 2011) and fat‐water imaging (Takasu et al , 2012), have become widely available on clinical MRI scanners, providing an opportunity to explore these techniques for response assessment. By detecting intra‐ and extracellular water flux, DWI provides a measure of tissue cellularity and changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) have been associated with treatment response (Hillengass et al , 2011; Giles et al , 2014). CE imaging is used to highlight abnormal vasculature, allowing detection of alterations of vasculature following therapy (Lin et al , 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%