2018
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018180492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-Body CT in Patients with Multiple Traumas: Factors Leading to Missed Injury

Abstract: Purpose To determine radiologic and clinical markers predictive of missed injuries at early whole-body CT image interpretation. Materials and Methods For this retrospective study, 2354 consecutive whole-body CT examinations were performed in patients with multiple traumas from 26 hospitals interpreted at a teleradiology center study during on-call period from February 2011 to September 2016. All whole-body CT images were interpreted by the on-call radiologist and reviewed within 12-48 hours by another radiolog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Garland’s pioneering study, significant error rates have been noted in varied plain film modalities including mammography, chest X-rays (CXR), and bone X-rays, involving radiologists not only in private practice (Siegle et al, 1998), but also in academic settings, where interpretive error rates range from 13 to 90% depending on experimental conditions and the functional definition of error (Garland, 1949; Lehr et al, 1976; Forrest and Friedman, 1981; Muhm et al, 1983; Berlin, 2007; Brady, 2017). Recent studies of new technologies in radiology have determined that high error rates also exist in CT, MRI, and Ultrasound interpretation (Berlin, 2014; Herzog et al, 2017; Banaste et al, 2018).…”
Section: Error Rates In Radiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Garland’s pioneering study, significant error rates have been noted in varied plain film modalities including mammography, chest X-rays (CXR), and bone X-rays, involving radiologists not only in private practice (Siegle et al, 1998), but also in academic settings, where interpretive error rates range from 13 to 90% depending on experimental conditions and the functional definition of error (Garland, 1949; Lehr et al, 1976; Forrest and Friedman, 1981; Muhm et al, 1983; Berlin, 2007; Brady, 2017). Recent studies of new technologies in radiology have determined that high error rates also exist in CT, MRI, and Ultrasound interpretation (Berlin, 2014; Herzog et al, 2017; Banaste et al, 2018).…”
Section: Error Rates In Radiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of COVID-19 diagnosis based on CT features by radiologists has been previously investigated, however, largely on a retrospective basis and within settings with a high prevalence of COVID-19. In a previous study (11), structured CT reports by radiologists from several hospitals were evaluated based on multicentric homogeneous data using logistic regression modelling. However, analysis of diagnostic accuracy may be hampered by the heterogeneity of radiologists involved with varying degrees of experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…n industrialized countries, mortality and disabilityadjusted life-years attributable to blunt multiple trauma decreased markedly during the past decades. 1 Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS), 2,3 implementation of trauma centers and networks, 4 hemostatic resuscitation, 5,6 early pelvic stabilization, 7 point-of-care ultrasonography, 8 resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, 9 and other complex interventions contributed to this trend. 10 Controversy exists about contrast-enhanced, whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) as a primary screening modality for suspected multiple trauma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%