2015
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole body counter assessment of internal radiocontamination in patients with end-stage renal disease living in areas affected by the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster: a retrospective observational study

Abstract: ObjectiveTo assess internal radiocontamination of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who were regularly taking haemodialysis (HD) and living in areas affected by the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant after the Great East Japan earthquake on 11 March 2011.MethodsInternal radiocontamination in 111 patients with ESRD regularly taking HD at Jyoban Hospital in Iwaki city, Fukushima from July 2012 to November 2012 was assessed with a whole body counter (WBC). The maximum annual effective dose was ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the six-year-period following the Fukushima incident, the levels of external/internal exposure risk in the affected areas have been evaluated by many research organizations and are well documented. Except for dose reconstruction estimation with scientific assumptions [ 12 , 13 ], most of these evaluations were based on voluntary-based radiation monitoring administered by local authorities, using an individual radiation dosimeter for determining the external exposure level [ 3 , 14 , 15 ] or anthropogammametry (i.e., whole body counting (WBC) for determining the amount of radionuclides within the body at the time of monitoring) [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. In summary, as a result of the counter-dose measures as well as natural removal phenomena such as weather and radioactive decay [ 6 ], the current exposure risks from radiation in the environment (attributable to the Fukushima incident) is considerably low or at undetectable levels [ 20 ], implying a marginal risk of radiation-associated physical health consequences of the incident [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the six-year-period following the Fukushima incident, the levels of external/internal exposure risk in the affected areas have been evaluated by many research organizations and are well documented. Except for dose reconstruction estimation with scientific assumptions [ 12 , 13 ], most of these evaluations were based on voluntary-based radiation monitoring administered by local authorities, using an individual radiation dosimeter for determining the external exposure level [ 3 , 14 , 15 ] or anthropogammametry (i.e., whole body counting (WBC) for determining the amount of radionuclides within the body at the time of monitoring) [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. In summary, as a result of the counter-dose measures as well as natural removal phenomena such as weather and radioactive decay [ 6 ], the current exposure risks from radiation in the environment (attributable to the Fukushima incident) is considerably low or at undetectable levels [ 20 ], implying a marginal risk of radiation-associated physical health consequences of the incident [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%