2018
DOI: 10.1159/000492420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole Blood Gene Expression Reveals Specific Transcriptome Changes in Neonatal Encephalopathy

Abstract: Background: Variable responses to hypothermic neuroprotection are related to the clinical heterogeneity of encephalopathic babies; hence better disease stratification may facilitate the development of individualized neuroprotective therapies. Objectives: We examined if whole blood gene expression analysis can identify specific transcriptome profiles in neonatal encephalopathy. Material and Methods: We performed next-generation sequencing on whole blood RNA from 12 babies with neonatal encephalopathy and 6 time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, our findings stress the leading role of HIF-1α in NE, which is involved in both the melatonin and polo-like kinase cascades 27 30 and interacts directly with both RGS1 and SMC4, which are downstream targets of HIF-1α 30 , 31 . These results are also consistent with our previous data, comparing healthy infants and NE, which showed an upregulation of HIF1A and MALAT1 in NE 9 . MALAT1 inhibits HIF-1α ubiquitination and in this way, enhances its activity and increases anaerobic glycolysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taken together, our findings stress the leading role of HIF-1α in NE, which is involved in both the melatonin and polo-like kinase cascades 27 30 and interacts directly with both RGS1 and SMC4, which are downstream targets of HIF-1α 30 , 31 . These results are also consistent with our previous data, comparing healthy infants and NE, which showed an upregulation of HIF1A and MALAT1 in NE 9 . MALAT1 inhibits HIF-1α ubiquitination and in this way, enhances its activity and increases anaerobic glycolysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The use of gene expression for disease stratification and for elucidation of underlying disease mechanisms has previously been shown in sepsis, paediatric tuberculosis and Kawasaki Disease 6 8 . More recently, we have reported that babies with NE have a unique gene expression profile when compared with healthy controls and septic babies, and have an upregulation of the hypoxia inducible transcription factor 1α (HIF1α) 9 . Here, we examined if babies who developed adverse neurodevelopmental outcome after NE, had a unique host blood gene expression profile at birth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, several studies on gene expression analysis using microarrays showed promising results even by using a small number of samples [10,16,49]. Here, despite the limited number of subjects studied for the transcriptome analysis, we obtained sufficient statistical power to identify blood transcriptomic signature which distinguish CM and UM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, deciphering the complex regulatory processes of pathophysiological pathways in human brain remains a challenge due to the inaccessibility of antemortem tissue. Fortunately, the studies on peripheral blood can provide important mechanistic knowledge that may have therapeutic implications [ 13 15 ] as shown previously into various infectious and neurological diseases [ 16 19 ]. Hence, we speculated that multiple dysregulated pathways may favor CM and that we are able to identify most of them in peripheral blood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanistic studies and newer methods of classifying neonates with NE based on the underlying injury mechanism would be required to develop specific neuroprotective therapies. Specific gene expression signatures of neonates with NE have been described [ 70 ]. In a small sub-group of 45 neonates recruited to the HELIX trial, a total of 855 genes were significantly differentially expressed between the good and adverse outcome groups, of which RGS1 and SMC4 were the most significant [ 71 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%