2018
DOI: 10.3366/drs.2018.0219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whoever Pays the Piper Calls the Tune: Kurt Jooss, Public Subsidy, and Private Patronage

Abstract: This article discusses how subsidy and patronage from German municipalities, private individuals, and British organisations supported Kurt Jooss's artistic output enabling him to create new work, to have high production values, and to present and disseminate his work in Britain, across Europe, the USA and South America. Working chronologically, consideration is given to how each sponsor and benefactor impacted on Jooss's work, particularly his activities as a theatre/opera director and as a choreographer for B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Dartington Trust sought to make the company and the Jooss-Leeder School pay for themselves but the substantial funds of the trust, and the private wealth of Dorothy Elmhirst from which she frequently supported Jooss and his family, cushioned any major expenditure. 17 What would de Mille have given for such support? One of her problems, as she saw it, was that people often thought she had similar support from the de Mille family when, from her perspective, this was not the case: She had limited financial support from her mother but not from her father or uncle, the film director Cecil B. de Mille.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dartington Trust sought to make the company and the Jooss-Leeder School pay for themselves but the substantial funds of the trust, and the private wealth of Dorothy Elmhirst from which she frequently supported Jooss and his family, cushioned any major expenditure. 17 What would de Mille have given for such support? One of her problems, as she saw it, was that people often thought she had similar support from the de Mille family when, from her perspective, this was not the case: She had limited financial support from her mother but not from her father or uncle, the film director Cecil B. de Mille.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%