Who Wants to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions?

Abstract

Objective. We examine cognitive, economic, and partisan heuristic theories of why some people express support for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Methods. Data come from a mail survey of 623 residents of central Pennsylvania, a region in which mitigation costs exceed potential benefits from slowing the rate of global warming. Results. Ordinary least squares analysis shows that people who can accurately identify the causes of climate change and who expect bad consequences from climate change are likely to support both government anti‐fossil fuel initiatives and voluntary actions. Economic circumstances and anxieties are not important predictors, but the belief that environmental protection efforts do not threaten jobs for people like the respondent, limit personal freedoms, and hurt the economy is a strong predictor. Democrats are more likely than Republicans to support government efforts to reduce emissions. Conclusions. Cognitive explanations of support for reducing greenhouse gas emissions are more powerful than economic or partisan heuristic ones. People want to reduce emissions if they understand the causes of climate change, if they perceive substantial risks from climate change if average surface temperatures increase, and if they think climate change mitigation policies will not cost them their jobs.

Communicating Climate Change: Closing the Science‐Action Gap

“…But ignorance about the details of climate change is NOT what prevents greater concern and action. While knowledge about the causes of climate change is moderately correlated with appropriate behavioral responses (O'Connor et al 2002), and deeper understanding of systems primes audiences to more readily understand the magnitude of the required response (Sterman 2008), there is also evidence that better knowledge about climate change does not necessarily raise concern, and even better understanding about possible solutions does not necessarily result in efficacious behavior (Gardner and Stern 2002).…”

Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design

“…To provide policymakers with knowledge to help them design international climate policy, the scientific community has intensely examined alternative structures, cost scenarios, and reduction targets of an effective global climate policy architecture (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) and has generated informative survey evidence on individuals' general attitudes and beliefs about climate change (6)(7)(8)(9). Although these previous studies provide important knowledge, any global climate policy aimed at effectively reducing global warming requires broad public support to be sustainable over the long run.…”

Spatial determinants of local government action on climate change: an analysis of local authorities in England

“…Local economic landscapes have also been found to influence political will to engage in climate change policies (Bulkeley and Betshill, 2003;Bulkeley and Kern, 2006;Elliott et al, 1997;Lorenzoni et al, 2007;O'Connor et al, 2002;Zahran et al, 2006;Zahran et al, 2008a;Zahran et al, 2008b). Thus the areas which contribute most to the climate change problem in terms of industrial structure and per capita carbon emissions are least likely to be involved in voluntary climate protection schemes Zahran et al, 2008a;Zahran et al, 2008b).…”