2016
DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-133999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who to handover: a case–control study of a novel scoring system to prioritise handover of internal medicine inpatients

Abstract: The iHAND score had moderate ability to predict which patients required assessment overnight, while MEWS score and current gestalt approach correlated poorly, suggesting the iHAND score may help prioritisation of patients likely to be seen overnight for handover.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hand off criteria (iHAND) was developed following a literature review and focus groups of eight clinical faculty members and six CAs. Validation of iHAND was done in a case control analysis of 90 inpatients, where the effectiveness of clinical gestalt, MEWS, and iHAND were evaluated using logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves [ 12 ]. The iHAND criteria showed a moderately significant correlation with requiring assessment overnight S1 File .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hand off criteria (iHAND) was developed following a literature review and focus groups of eight clinical faculty members and six CAs. Validation of iHAND was done in a case control analysis of 90 inpatients, where the effectiveness of clinical gestalt, MEWS, and iHAND were evaluated using logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves [ 12 ]. The iHAND criteria showed a moderately significant correlation with requiring assessment overnight S1 File .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%