Who Takes Part in the Political Game? The Sex Work Governance Debate in Israel

Abstract

Introduction This study explores the recent neo-abolitionist legislation of the Israeli sex industry by illustrating the competing claims of various stakeholders: those leading the legal change and those protesting it. The main question is how Israeli sex workers perceive the public debate over governing the Israeli sex industry. Methods This study combines qualitative methods that include ethnographic observations and interviews. The ethnographic observations were carried out between November 2018 and October 2019 in gatherings, protests, and academic conferences where sex workers were the lead speakers. In addition, 16 in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with sex workers across various indoor sectors, and four interviews were conducted with political figures to learn about their efforts to adopt neoabolitionist legislation. Results the Israeli legislative proceedings initiated in 2007 deny sex workers a voice and exclude them from the political space and policy debates that have a direct bearing on their working lives and wellbeing. Thus, Israeli sex workers perceive sex work governance as controlling their agency and deepening their stigmatization. In this process, we show how contrasting groups became strange bedfellows in their attempt to protect sex workers by incriminating clients of the sex industry. Conclusions We conclude that the binary framings of debates about sex work in Israel do not address the actual needs or political desires of sex workers who are ignored and excluded from the discourse about them. Policy Implications Furthermore, we conclude that the issue at hand is not about permitting sex workers to express their views but rather about the need to listen to their critiques to ensure that policy is built on their knowledge and experience.

How perceptions of masculinity and intimate sexual relationships shape men’s experiences of paying for sex: A qualitative exploration

“…Nonetheless, prostitution is highly stigmatized in Israeli society – as evident in Israeli cultural, political, academic and media discourses on the topic (Almog, 2010). In recent years, the view that paying for sex is a form of violence against women has increasingly gained currency in Israeli public, professional and social advocacy discourses (Lahav-Raz, 2020) – as evident in a public campaign to criminalize the purchasing of sex, which culminated in the enactment of a law in July 2020 that criminalizes the practice (Levy-Aronovic et al, 2020). Dissenting voices of sex workers’ rights organizations were non-existent in Israel at the time of the data collection, and are still marginalized in Israeli public discourse nowadays.…”

“It’s probably an addiction—It can't be anything else”: The role of addiction discourse in the self-identity of men who pay for sex.

“…The Israeli context in which the study was conducted merits special attention. The view that paying for sex is a form of violence against women has become increasingly prevalent in the past decade in the Israeli public, professional, and social advocacy discourses (Levy-Aronovic et al, 2021). In 2018, the Israeli parliament passed the Prohibition of Prostitution Consumption Law, which came into effect in July 2020.…”

A Social-Legal Analysis of Reforms in the Regulation of Sex Work: The Case Study of End Demand Legislation in Israel

“…74 Argaman's first priorities were to resist the introduction of End Demand legislation and to make their members' voices heard and interests considered in policy processes. 75 However, their ability to influence the policy process was limited. The workers "described the legislation process as taking place 'over their heads' and deciding for them what is best for them, which, they stated, was 'not very feminist' nor a show of genuine concern."…”